Custom, culture and crime: A restorative justice response to culturally motivated crimes in South Africa.

South Africa’s 1996 Constitution introduced a dual legal system, recognising African customary law and common law traditions. This article examines how culturally motivated crimes challenge South Africa’s retributive criminal justice system, and explores restorative justice as a more appropriate alternative. Using doctrinal research methods, it analyses constitutional provisions, case law, statutory developments and indigenous practices to evaluate how cultural rights can be integrated into criminal law without undermining justice. The findings show that while South African courts have historically marginalised customary law in criminal proceedings, the Constitution provides a framework for greater incorporation of indigenous principles, particularly restorative, participatory processes that emphasise healing and accountability. The article shows that customary justice practices inherently reflect the fundamental principles of restorative justice. Accordingly, it recommends leveraging existing mechanisms such as victim-offender mediation, family group conferencing and restorative circles as culturally responsive alternatives for addressing culturally motivated crimes in South Africa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South African Crime Quarterly
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17159/sacq.n74.21358
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Custom, culture and crime: A restorative justice response to culturally motivated crimes in South Africa.

Jacques Matthee
South African Crime Quarterly
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Custom, culture and crime: A restorative justice response to culturally motivated crimes in South Africa.

Jacques Matthee
article en

Abstract

South Africa’s 1996 Constitution introduced a dual legal system, recognising African customary law and common law traditions. This article examines how culturally motivated crimes challenge South Africa’s retributive criminal justice system, and explores restorative justice as a more appropriate alternative. Using doctrinal research methods, it analyses constitutional provisions, case law, statutory developments and indigenous practices to evaluate how cultural rights can be integrated into criminal law without undermining justice. The findings show that while South African courts have historically marginalised customary law in criminal proceedings, the Constitution provides a framework for greater incorporation of indigenous principles, particularly restorative, participatory processes that emphasise healing and accountability. The article shows that customary justice practices inherently reflect the fundamental principles of restorative justice. Accordingly, it recommends leveraging existing mechanisms such as victim-offender mediation, family group conferencing and restorative circles as culturally responsive alternatives for addressing culturally motivated crimes in South Africa.

South African Crime Quarterly(74)
University of the Free State (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Custom, culture and crime: A restorative justice response to culturally motivated crimes in South Africa. — Jacques Matthee · South African Crime Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS