On the Impact of Government Debt on Income Distribution in a Post‐Keynesian Framework With Workers' Saving

ABSTRACT This paper examines the complex relationship between government debt and income distribution within a post‐Keynesian framework. Extending the model of You and Dutt (1996), we model both capitalists and workers as holders of government bonds, enabling a more nuanced analysis of income distribution dynamics. In our model, public debt accumulation does not invariably lead to greater inequality, but it can reduce income disparities instead. The mechanism at work diverges from the conventional account according to which a redistribution from taxpayers to bondholders occurs. Instead, the more important channel operates through the expansionary effects of public borrowing. When the analysis is extended to allow for an endogenous rise in real interest rates, the outcome also reflects the dampening of investment and, consequently, reduced growth. The distributional consequences of higher debt therefore depend on the forces driving accumulation and the extent to which they generate expansionary dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metroeconomica
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.70005
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Impact of Government Debt on Income Distribution in a Post‐Keynesian Framework With Workers' Saving

Hagen Krämer, Sven Schnellbacher, Christian R. Proaño
Metroeconomica
Economic Theory and Policy
article

On the Impact of Government Debt on Income Distribution in a Post‐Keynesian Framework With Workers' Saving

Hagen Krämer, Sven Schnellbacher, Christian R. Proaño
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the complex relationship between government debt and income distribution within a post‐Keynesian framework. Extending the model of You and Dutt (1996), we model both capitalists and workers as holders of government bonds, enabling a more nuanced analysis of income distribution dynamics. In our model, public debt accumulation does not invariably lead to greater inequality, but it can reduce income disparities instead. The mechanism at work diverges from the conventional account according to which a redistribution from taxpayers to bondholders occurs. Instead, the more important channel operates through the expansionary effects of public borrowing. When the analysis is extended to allow for an endogenous rise in real interest rates, the outcome also reflects the dampening of investment and, consequently, reduced growth. The distributional consequences of higher debt therefore depend on the forces driving accumulation and the extent to which they generate expansionary dynamics.

Metroeconomica
University of Canberra (AU), Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Bamberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Economic Theory and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.