Prevalence of Fetal Structural Anomalies and Genetic Testing in Fetuses With Increased Nuchal Translucency: A Single-Center Cohort Study and Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis Comparing Latin America and Other Regions

Background: Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is the recommended genetic test for fetuses with increased nuchal translucency (NT); however, its use in Latin America remains limited. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of genetic testing in fetuses with increased NT in Panama and across Latin America. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1512 women who underwent first-trimester screening in Panama, along with a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting genetic testing in Latin America. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across MEDLINE (via PubMed), Epistemonikos, LILACS, BRISA, SciELO, and Google Scholar, covering studies from inception to June 2023 was updated to December 2023. The extracted data included population, setting, timing, and genetic testing methods. The Joanna Briggs Tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: Among 1236 fetuses in the Panamanian cohort, 77 (6.23%) had NT ≥95th percentile. The systematic review included 11 studies encompassing 842 fetuses diagnosed with increased NT. The overall proportion of fetuses undergoing invasive testing was 0.31 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28–0.33). Anomalies were found in 63% of cases with increased NT. CMA was not reported in any of the studies. Conclusions: Most patients in Latin America do not undergo invasive testing, and conventional karyotyping remains the most frequently performed method. To date, no studies have reported the use of CMA in this context. Therefore, the findings of this study highlight significant gaps in access to genetic testing, emphasizing the need for strategic initiatives to improve test availability and build capacity for implementing microarray analysis in the region. Registration: The study has been registered on https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ (registration number: CRD42023398899; registration link: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023398899).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/ceog39182
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of Fetal Structural Anomalies and Genetic Testing in Fetuses With Increased Nuchal Translucency: A Single-Center Cohort Study and Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis Comparing Latin America and Other Regions

Amador Goodridge, Yovani Edgar Chávez Rodríguez, Ameth Hawkins-Villarreal, Jorge David Mendez-Rios et al.
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Prevalence of Fetal Structural Anomalies and Genetic Testing in Fetuses With Increased Nuchal Translucency: A Single-Center Cohort Study and Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis Comparing Latin America and Other Regions

Amador Goodridge, Yovani Edgar Chávez Rodríguez, Ameth Hawkins-Villarreal, Jorge David Mendez-Rios, Tania T. Herrera, Idalina Cubilla‐Batista, Anthonier Hinestroza
article en

Abstract

Background: Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is the recommended genetic test for fetuses with increased nuchal translucency (NT); however, its use in Latin America remains limited. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of genetic testing in fetuses with increased NT in Panama and across Latin America. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1512 women who underwent first-trimester screening in Panama, along with a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting genetic testing in Latin America. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across MEDLINE (via PubMed), Epistemonikos, LILACS, BRISA, SciELO, and Google Scholar, covering studies from inception to June 2023 was updated to December 2023. The extracted data included population, setting, timing, and genetic testing methods. The Joanna Briggs Tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Results: Among 1236 fetuses in the Panamanian cohort, 77 (6.23%) had NT ≥95th percentile. The systematic review included 11 studies encompassing 842 fetuses diagnosed with increased NT. The overall proportion of fetuses undergoing invasive testing was 0.31 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28–0.33). Anomalies were found in 63% of cases with increased NT. CMA was not reported in any of the studies. Conclusions: Most patients in Latin America do not undergo invasive testing, and conventional karyotyping remains the most frequently performed method. To date, no studies have reported the use of CMA in this context. Therefore, the findings of this study highlight significant gaps in access to genetic testing, emphasizing the need for strategic initiatives to improve test availability and build capacity for implementing microarray analysis in the region. Registration: The study has been registered on https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ (registration number: CRD42023398899; registration link: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023398899).

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & GynecologyVol. 52(11)
Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona (ES), Rafael Advanced Defense Systems (Israel) (IL), Universidad Iberoamericana (MX), Hospital Punta Pacifica (PA), Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec (CA), Saint Thomas Hospital (PA), Secretaría Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (PA), Centre hospitalier de l'Université Laval (CA), Universidad Interamericana de Panamá (PA), Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Servicios de Alta Tecnología (PA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.