Effects of the Electron Concentration, d‐Orbital Energy Level, and Atomic Mismatch on Quantitative Phase Prediction in Complex Concentrated Alloys (CCAs): Empirical Criteria and Machine Learning Insights

ABSTRACT Dual‐phase high‐entropy alloys (DPHEAs) exhibit superior strength‐ductility synergy compared to single‐phase counterparts, with properties strongly governed by phase fraction. This necessitates robust quantitative phase prediction, as most prior studies remain qualitative. In this study, we develop and evaluate two complementary frameworks for quantitative phase prediction in DPHEAs: a threshold‐based approach and a machine learning (ML) approach. Both methods incorporate key descriptors of electronic structure and atomic size mismatch, including valence electron concentration (VEC), atomic size difference (δ), d‐orbital energy level (Md), and a newly introduced critical mismatch factor (δ c ). Amongst the threshold‐based approach, VEC + δ c showed the highest accuracy (81%), while in the ML approach, the random forest (RF) achieved 88% accuracy. The Md and VEC have similar predictive capability within the framework of threshold‐based modeling, owing to the high linear correlation between VEC and Md (Pearson coefficient of 0.97). Whereas δ c , which shows minimal correlation with electronic descriptors, emerged as the dominant parameter in threshold‐based modeling. In contrast, feature importance analysis from the RF regression identified Md as the dominant predictor, surpassing the commonly used VEC. The study demonstrated that electronic structure descriptors and atomic mismatch measures are complementary in nature for reliable phase prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Theory and Simulations
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.202501736
Primary Topic
High Entropy Alloys Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of the Electron Concentration, d‐Orbital Energy Level, and Atomic Mismatch on Quantitative Phase Prediction in Complex Concentrated Alloys (CCAs): Empirical Criteria and Machine Learning Insights

T. Shanmugasundaram, Ankit Negi, Ayush Sourav
Advanced Theory and Simulations
High Entropy Alloys Studies
article

Effects of the Electron Concentration, d‐Orbital Energy Level, and Atomic Mismatch on Quantitative Phase Prediction in Complex Concentrated Alloys (CCAs): Empirical Criteria and Machine Learning Insights

T. Shanmugasundaram, Ankit Negi, Ayush Sourav
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Dual‐phase high‐entropy alloys (DPHEAs) exhibit superior strength‐ductility synergy compared to single‐phase counterparts, with properties strongly governed by phase fraction. This necessitates robust quantitative phase prediction, as most prior studies remain qualitative. In this study, we develop and evaluate two complementary frameworks for quantitative phase prediction in DPHEAs: a threshold‐based approach and a machine learning (ML) approach. Both methods incorporate key descriptors of electronic structure and atomic size mismatch, including valence electron concentration (VEC), atomic size difference (δ), d‐orbital energy level (Md), and a newly introduced critical mismatch factor (δ c ). Amongst the threshold‐based approach, VEC + δ c showed the highest accuracy (81%), while in the ML approach, the random forest (RF) achieved 88% accuracy. The Md and VEC have similar predictive capability within the framework of threshold‐based modeling, owing to the high linear correlation between VEC and Md (Pearson coefficient of 0.97). Whereas δ c , which shows minimal correlation with electronic descriptors, emerged as the dominant parameter in threshold‐based modeling. In contrast, feature importance analysis from the RF regression identified Md as the dominant predictor, surpassing the commonly used VEC. The study demonstrated that electronic structure descriptors and atomic mismatch measures are complementary in nature for reliable phase prediction.

Advanced Theory and SimulationsVol. 9(3)
Defence Institute of Advanced Technology (IN)
Defence Research and Development Organisation, Naval Research Board, Office of Naval Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
High Entropy Alloys Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effects of the Electron Concentration, d‐Orbital Energy Level, and Atomic Mismatch on Quantitative Phase Prediction in Complex Concentrated Alloys (CCAs): Empirical Criteria and Machine Learning Insights — T. Shanmugasundaram, Ankit Negi, et al. · Advanced Theory and Simulations (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS