Explainable AI in healthcare: to explain, to predict, or to describe?

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods are designed to provide information about how AI-based models make predictions. In healthcare, there is a widespread expectation that these methods will provide relevant and accurate information about a model's inner-workings to different stakeholders (ranging from patients and healthcare providers to AI and medical guideline developers). This is a challenging endeavor since what qualifies as relevant information may differ greatly depending on the stakeholder. For many stakeholders, relevant explanations are causal in nature, yet, explainable AI methods are often not able to deliver this information. Using the Describe-Predict-Explain framework, we argue that Explainable AI methods are good descriptive tools, as they may help to describe how a model works but are limited in their ability to explain why a model works in terms of true underlying biological mechanisms and cause-and-effect relations. This limits the suitability of explainable AI methods to provide actionable advice to patients or to judge the face validity of AI-based models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-025-00213-8
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explainable AI in healthcare: to explain, to predict, or to describe?

Fernando V. Paulovich, Bram C.M. Cappers, Sanne Abeln, Anne de Hond et al.
3 citations
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
7.44
article

Explainable AI in healthcare: to explain, to predict, or to describe?

Fernando V. Paulovich, Bram C.M. Cappers, Sanne Abeln, Anne de Hond, Karel G.M. Moons, Alex Carriero, Maarten van Smeden
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods are designed to provide information about how AI-based models make predictions. In healthcare, there is a widespread expectation that these methods will provide relevant and accurate information about a model's inner-workings to different stakeholders (ranging from patients and healthcare providers to AI and medical guideline developers). This is a challenging endeavor since what qualifies as relevant information may differ greatly depending on the stakeholder. For many stakeholders, relevant explanations are causal in nature, yet, explainable AI methods are often not able to deliver this information. Using the Describe-Predict-Explain framework, we argue that Explainable AI methods are good descriptive tools, as they may help to describe how a model works but are limited in their ability to explain why a model works in terms of true underlying biological mechanisms and cause-and-effect relations. This limits the suitability of explainable AI methods to provide actionable advice to patients or to judge the face validity of AI-based models.

Diagnostic and Prognostic ResearchVol. 9(1)
Utrecht University (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Explainable AI in healthcare: to explain, to predict, or to describe? — Fernando V. Paulovich, Bram C.M. Cappers, et al. · Diagnostic and Prognostic Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS