A trade‐off between leaf water retention capacity and rehydration capacity among plant species

How plants cope with drought remains a major challenge in plant biology. Plants have evolved diverse drought resistance strategies, whether they operate synergistically or exhibit trade-offs remains a critical knowledge gap. Here, we examined drought resistance strategies across 128 plant species, encompassing diverse plant phyla, original biomes, leaf types, and growth forms. Their leaf water retention capacity, rehydration capacity, and anatomical traits of leaves were measured. Our analyses revealed a significant negative correlation between leaf water retention capacity and rehydration capacity (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.55, P < 0.001), providing compelling evidence for an trade-off between desiccation avoidance and desiccation tolerance at the leaf level. This trade-off exhibits clear anatomical underpinnings in leaf structural traits including cell size, leaf thickness, vein density, and xylem proportion. We found significant variations in both capacities across plant phyla, original biomes, and leaf types, suggesting that vascular structure evolution and habitat adaptation may be primary drivers shaping drought resistance strategies. Notably, interspecific differences in leaf water retention capacity were mainly due to variations in water loss rate rather than water storage capacity. Our findings advance mechanistic understanding of drought resistance strategies across different plant types and contribute to improved predictions of vegetation responses to climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Phytologist
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70821
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A trade‐off between leaf water retention capacity and rehydration capacity among plant species

Dongliang Xiong, Yang Xiao, Tingting Du, Junzhou Liu et al.
New Phytologist
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

A trade‐off between leaf water retention capacity and rehydration capacity among plant species

Dongliang Xiong, Yang Xiao, Tingting Du, Junzhou Liu, Jinfang Zhao, Hui Zhang, Zhuo Chen, Sheng Liang, Xianke Yang
article en

Abstract

How plants cope with drought remains a major challenge in plant biology. Plants have evolved diverse drought resistance strategies, whether they operate synergistically or exhibit trade-offs remains a critical knowledge gap. Here, we examined drought resistance strategies across 128 plant species, encompassing diverse plant phyla, original biomes, leaf types, and growth forms. Their leaf water retention capacity, rehydration capacity, and anatomical traits of leaves were measured. Our analyses revealed a significant negative correlation between leaf water retention capacity and rehydration capacity (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.55, P < 0.001), providing compelling evidence for an trade-off between desiccation avoidance and desiccation tolerance at the leaf level. This trade-off exhibits clear anatomical underpinnings in leaf structural traits including cell size, leaf thickness, vein density, and xylem proportion. We found significant variations in both capacities across plant phyla, original biomes, and leaf types, suggesting that vascular structure evolution and habitat adaptation may be primary drivers shaping drought resistance strategies. Notably, interspecific differences in leaf water retention capacity were mainly due to variations in water loss rate rather than water storage capacity. Our findings advance mechanistic understanding of drought resistance strategies across different plant types and contribute to improved predictions of vegetation responses to climate change.

New PhytologistVol. 249(4)
Huazhong Agricultural University (CN), China Agricultural University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.