Performance Metrics in Pattern Recognition: A TOPSIS-Based Analytical Framework

Pattern recognition has emerged as an important computational approach for analyzing complex datasets in various domains. This study uses the TOPSIS method. The research examines five key pattern recognition tasks: pattern detection, identification, analysis, classification, and trend recognition, evaluated on four important performance metrics: accuracy, specificity, time complexity, and robustness. Through a rigorous analytical framework, the study reveals pattern classification as the most effective method, demonstrating exceptional performance with 99.11% accuracy and 98.24% specificity. Trend recognition emerged as the second most effective approach, exhibiting strong specificity (87.54%) and efficiency (77.88%). Pattern analysis distinguished itself with significant time complexity (87.21%), indicating strong computational capabilities. The research used equal weighting of the evaluation criteria, using normalized data and a weighted normal decision matrix to ensure a balanced evaluation, to provide detailed insights into the strengths and limitations of each method. The TOPSIS method established a clear performance hierarchy and facilitated a systematic ranking of pattern recognition techniques. The findings have broad implications for machine learning, data science, and artificial intelligence, providing practitioners with a strategic framework for method selection. By highlighting the multifaceted nature of pattern recognition, this study helps to understand the evolving landscape of computational analysis techniques. Future research directions include exploring additional performance metrics and developing sophisticated pattern recognition algorithms.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal on Electronic and Automation Engineering
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46632/jeae/4/4/1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Metrics in Pattern Recognition: A TOPSIS-Based Analytical Framework

2 citations
Journal on Electronic and Automation Engineering
Machine Learning and Data Classification
4.96
article

Performance Metrics in Pattern Recognition: A TOPSIS-Based Analytical Framework

article en
2 citations

Abstract

Pattern recognition has emerged as an important computational approach for analyzing complex datasets in various domains. This study uses the TOPSIS method. The research examines five key pattern recognition tasks: pattern detection, identification, analysis, classification, and trend recognition, evaluated on four important performance metrics: accuracy, specificity, time complexity, and robustness. Through a rigorous analytical framework, the study reveals pattern classification as the most effective method, demonstrating exceptional performance with 99.11% accuracy and 98.24% specificity. Trend recognition emerged as the second most effective approach, exhibiting strong specificity (87.54%) and efficiency (77.88%). Pattern analysis distinguished itself with significant time complexity (87.21%), indicating strong computational capabilities. The research used equal weighting of the evaluation criteria, using normalized data and a weighted normal decision matrix to ensure a balanced evaluation, to provide detailed insights into the strengths and limitations of each method. The TOPSIS method established a clear performance hierarchy and facilitated a systematic ranking of pattern recognition techniques. The findings have broad implications for machine learning, data science, and artificial intelligence, providing practitioners with a strategic framework for method selection. By highlighting the multifaceted nature of pattern recognition, this study helps to understand the evolving landscape of computational analysis techniques. Future research directions include exploring additional performance metrics and developing sophisticated pattern recognition algorithms.

Journal on Electronic and Automation EngineeringVol. 4(4, December 2025)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.