A scoping review of transcription instruction involving children with autism

Abstract Background Spelling, handwriting and typing (transcription) skills are foundational to writing development. This scoping review maps the research on transcription instruction involving children with autism, highlighting promising practices and future research priorities. Method A systematic search identified relevant studies, with data extracted and critically appraised in line with established protocols. Results Of 4859 identified studies, 28 met inclusion criteria. Most were of moderate strength and good quality and reported on the effects of handwriting ( n = 14) or spelling instruction ( n = 9), finding that purpose‐built and established programmes designed for the general population may benefit some autistic children. Few studies ( n = 4) reported on how instruction is delivered or autistic children's experiences ( n = 1). Conclusion Established programmes, including Cover‐Copy‐Compare and Handwriting Without Tears, show promise when adjusted to meet users' needs. Future research should engage the Autistic community in co‐designing instruction tailored to individual needs and preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research in Reading
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.70016
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A scoping review of transcription instruction involving children with autism

Karen Ray, Benjamin Bailey, Kelsey Philpott‐Robinson
Journal of Research in Reading
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

A scoping review of transcription instruction involving children with autism

Karen Ray, Benjamin Bailey, Kelsey Philpott‐Robinson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Spelling, handwriting and typing (transcription) skills are foundational to writing development. This scoping review maps the research on transcription instruction involving children with autism, highlighting promising practices and future research priorities. Method A systematic search identified relevant studies, with data extracted and critically appraised in line with established protocols. Results Of 4859 identified studies, 28 met inclusion criteria. Most were of moderate strength and good quality and reported on the effects of handwriting ( n = 14) or spelling instruction ( n = 9), finding that purpose‐built and established programmes designed for the general population may benefit some autistic children. Few studies ( n = 4) reported on how instruction is delivered or autistic children's experiences ( n = 1). Conclusion Established programmes, including Cover‐Copy‐Compare and Handwriting Without Tears, show promise when adjusted to meet users' needs. Future research should engage the Autistic community in co‐designing instruction tailored to individual needs and preferences.

Journal of Research in ReadingVol. 49(1)
La Trobe University (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.