An upper bound on the silhouette evaluation metric for clustering

• Derives a global, data-dependent upper bound for average silhouette width (ASW). • Gives pointwise silhouette-width bounds, and aggregates them to the ASW ceiling. • Computes bounds from pairwise dissimilarities in O(n2 log n) time overall only. • Experiments show bounds aid ASW interpretation; usefulness is datasetdependent. • Extends the framework to an upper bound for the macro-averaged silhouette score. The silhouette coefficient quantifies, for each observation, the balance between within-cluster cohesion and between-cluster separation, taking values in the range [ − 1 , 1 ] . The average silhouette width ( ASW ) is a widely used internal measure of clustering quality, with higher values indicating more cohesive and well-separated clusters. However, the dataset-specific maximum of ASW is typically unknown, and the standard upper limit of 1 is rarely attainable. In this work, we derive for each data point a sharp upper bound on its silhouette width and aggregate these to obtain a canonical upper bound of the ASW . This bound—often substantially below 1—enhances the interpretability of empirical ASW values by providing guidance on how close a given clustering result is to the best possible outcome for that dataset. We evaluate the usefulness of the upper bound on a variety of datasets and conclude that it can meaningfully enrich cluster quality evaluation; however, its practical relevance depends on the specific dataset. Finally, we extend the framework to establish an upper bound of the macro-averaged silhouette.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pattern Recognition
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2026.113402
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
52.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An upper bound on the silhouette evaluation metric for clustering

Duy-Tai Dinh, Hugo Sträng
1 citations
Pattern Recognition
Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
52.10
article

An upper bound on the silhouette evaluation metric for clustering

Duy-Tai Dinh, Hugo Sträng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Derives a global, data-dependent upper bound for average silhouette width (ASW). • Gives pointwise silhouette-width bounds, and aggregates them to the ASW ceiling. • Computes bounds from pairwise dissimilarities in O(n2 log n) time overall only. • Experiments show bounds aid ASW interpretation; usefulness is datasetdependent. • Extends the framework to an upper bound for the macro-averaged silhouette score. The silhouette coefficient quantifies, for each observation, the balance between within-cluster cohesion and between-cluster separation, taking values in the range [ − 1 , 1 ] . The average silhouette width ( ASW ) is a widely used internal measure of clustering quality, with higher values indicating more cohesive and well-separated clusters. However, the dataset-specific maximum of ASW is typically unknown, and the standard upper limit of 1 is rarely attainable. In this work, we derive for each data point a sharp upper bound on its silhouette width and aggregate these to obtain a canonical upper bound of the ASW . This bound—often substantially below 1—enhances the interpretability of empirical ASW values by providing guidance on how close a given clustering result is to the best possible outcome for that dataset. We evaluate the usefulness of the upper bound on a variety of datasets and conclude that it can meaningfully enrich cluster quality evaluation; however, its practical relevance depends on the specific dataset. Finally, we extend the framework to establish an upper bound of the macro-averaged silhouette.

Pattern RecognitionVol. 178
Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
52.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.