Kant on the metaphysical foundation of inertia

This paper deals with Kant's elaboration of a metaphysical foundation of the principle of inertia in the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Many of Kant's contemporaries treat inertia not as an issue of mathematical physics but rather as a general feature of material objects that is addressed by metaphysics and, to some extent, by theology as well. In turn, inertia is often seen as the reason why matter is fundamentally passive, thus providing an argument against materialism. In particular, Abraham Gotthelf Kästner and Johann Samuel Traugott Gehler are considered on this score. They agree with Kant in that the principle of inertia follows from the general causal principle. Contrary to Kant, Kästner and Gehler treat inertia as a phenomenon of experience, whereas it seems a unique feature of Kant's approach to conceive of inertia as expressing the lifelessness of matter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Science
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2025.2596605
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kant on the metaphysical foundation of inertia

Falk Wunderlich
Annals of Science
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Kant on the metaphysical foundation of inertia

Falk Wunderlich
article en

Abstract

This paper deals with Kant's elaboration of a metaphysical foundation of the principle of inertia in the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Many of Kant's contemporaries treat inertia not as an issue of mathematical physics but rather as a general feature of material objects that is addressed by metaphysics and, to some extent, by theology as well. In turn, inertia is often seen as the reason why matter is fundamentally passive, thus providing an argument against materialism. In particular, Abraham Gotthelf Kästner and Johann Samuel Traugott Gehler are considered on this score. They agree with Kant in that the principle of inertia follows from the general causal principle. Contrary to Kant, Kästner and Gehler treat inertia as a phenomenon of experience, whereas it seems a unique feature of Kant's approach to conceive of inertia as expressing the lifelessness of matter.

Annals of Science
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Kant on the metaphysical foundation of inertia — Falk Wunderlich · Annals of Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS