Effect of cervical traction on balance parameters in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial

Cervical Radiculopathy (CR) is a neurologic condition characterized by a dysfunction of a cervical spinal nerve, the roots of the nerve, or both. In CR, one of the most unpleasant symptoms after radicular pain is cervicogenic dizziness, which is characterized by postural balance disorders. Despite its effectiveness on pain and function, cervical traction has not been used to treat postural balance disorders in CR patients. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of mechanical intermittent cervical traction (MICT) on clinical and posturographic balance parameters in patients with CR. Patients with cervical radiculopathy (CR), were randomized into three active intervention groups receiving different traction loads: 2 kg (group A), 8 kg (group B), and 12 kg (group C), allowing for a dose–response comparison within a randomized controlled framework. The 2 kg traction group served as a control condition. Each group underwent 12 sessions of MICT (three sessions per week), combined with a standard rehabilitation program. Assessments were conducted at baseline, at the end of treatment, and at 3 and 6 months post-treatment. Outcome measures included posturographic parameters, clinical balance (Brief BESTest), CR pain, cervical active range of motion, proprioception, muscle strength, handgrip strength, neck-related disability (Neck Disability Index), psychological status (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and quality of life (WHOQOL-Bref). The results showed that the surface of postural sway in the eyes-closed condition improved more significantly in group C than in groups A and B at the end of treatment (p = 0.04) and at 6-month (p = 0.014) follow-up. Radicular pain showed greater improvement in group C compared to groups A and B at the end of treatment (p = 0.029). Depression scores improved significantly in group C compared to group A at 3 months (p = 0.038). The physical domain of the WHOQOL-Bref improved more significantly in group C than in groups A and B at 3 months (p = 0.04) and 6 months (p = 0.001). Additionally, the psychological domain of the WHOQOL-Bref improved more significantly in group C than in groups A and B at 6 months (p = 0.017). MICT demonstrates a beneficial medium-term effects on posturographic parameters, pain, and depression in patients with CR, particularly when using a 12 kg load. The study protocol was retrospectively registered at the ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT06727747). Date of registration is 2024-10-14.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09221-7
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of cervical traction on balance parameters in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial

Catherine Nasrallah, Amr Chaabeni, Z. Ben Salah Frih, M. Jguirim et al.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Effect of cervical traction on balance parameters in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial

Catherine Nasrallah, Amr Chaabeni, Z. Ben Salah Frih, M. Jguirim, A. Jellad, Amine Kalai, Mohamed Hédi Bedoui, Imen Dghim, Ahmed Al Aqad
article en

Abstract

Cervical Radiculopathy (CR) is a neurologic condition characterized by a dysfunction of a cervical spinal nerve, the roots of the nerve, or both. In CR, one of the most unpleasant symptoms after radicular pain is cervicogenic dizziness, which is characterized by postural balance disorders. Despite its effectiveness on pain and function, cervical traction has not been used to treat postural balance disorders in CR patients. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of mechanical intermittent cervical traction (MICT) on clinical and posturographic balance parameters in patients with CR. Patients with cervical radiculopathy (CR), were randomized into three active intervention groups receiving different traction loads: 2 kg (group A), 8 kg (group B), and 12 kg (group C), allowing for a dose–response comparison within a randomized controlled framework. The 2 kg traction group served as a control condition. Each group underwent 12 sessions of MICT (three sessions per week), combined with a standard rehabilitation program. Assessments were conducted at baseline, at the end of treatment, and at 3 and 6 months post-treatment. Outcome measures included posturographic parameters, clinical balance (Brief BESTest), CR pain, cervical active range of motion, proprioception, muscle strength, handgrip strength, neck-related disability (Neck Disability Index), psychological status (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and quality of life (WHOQOL-Bref). The results showed that the surface of postural sway in the eyes-closed condition improved more significantly in group C than in groups A and B at the end of treatment (p = 0.04) and at 6-month (p = 0.014) follow-up. Radicular pain showed greater improvement in group C compared to groups A and B at the end of treatment (p = 0.029). Depression scores improved significantly in group C compared to group A at 3 months (p = 0.038). The physical domain of the WHOQOL-Bref improved more significantly in group C than in groups A and B at 3 months (p = 0.04) and 6 months (p = 0.001). Additionally, the psychological domain of the WHOQOL-Bref improved more significantly in group C than in groups A and B at 6 months (p = 0.017). MICT demonstrates a beneficial medium-term effects on posturographic parameters, pain, and depression in patients with CR, particularly when using a 12 kg load. The study protocol was retrospectively registered at the ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT06727747). Date of registration is 2024-10-14.

BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersVol. 27(1)
University of Monastir (TN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.