A comparison of carbon capture and biomass utilisation for decarbonising oxygen blast furnace ironmaking

The Iron and Steel industry stands as a significant industrial source of CO2 emissions, contributing 7% to the global CO2 emissions. Therefore, innovative methods for CO2 removal must be developed in the current path to heavy-industry decarbonization. This work presents and compares two low-carbon brownfield concepts, integrated in an existing steelmaking plant, which incorporates power-to-gas technology, top gas recycling and oxygen blast furnace. The first concept captures carbon via calcium looping and uses it as the source for the methanation plant to produce synthetic natural gas, which is injected in the blast furnace as reducing agent. The second concept is based on charcoal and syngas production through biomass pyrolysis. The former is pulverized and injected into the blast furnace, replacing part of the fossil coke used in the reference steelmaking plant. The latter is used as carbon source in the methanation stage, avoiding the carbon capture stage. Promising results are obtained for the concept which uses biomass as carbon source in the process, achieving a CO2 abatement cost of 64.5 €/tCO2. It is estimated that this cost could be reduced to 55.4 €/tCO2 by scale economy. Despite current economic challenges, the potential mid-term profitability, driven by the ongoing deployment of renewable energy, identifies the utilization of biomass as a solution for environmentally conscious steelmaking.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137810
Primary Topic
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of carbon capture and biomass utilisation for decarbonising oxygen blast furnace ironmaking

Jorge Perpiñán, Cristian Barón, Begoña Peña, Manuel Bailera
Fuel
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
article

A comparison of carbon capture and biomass utilisation for decarbonising oxygen blast furnace ironmaking

Jorge Perpiñán, Cristian Barón, Begoña Peña, Manuel Bailera
article en

Abstract

The Iron and Steel industry stands as a significant industrial source of CO2 emissions, contributing 7% to the global CO2 emissions. Therefore, innovative methods for CO2 removal must be developed in the current path to heavy-industry decarbonization. This work presents and compares two low-carbon brownfield concepts, integrated in an existing steelmaking plant, which incorporates power-to-gas technology, top gas recycling and oxygen blast furnace. The first concept captures carbon via calcium looping and uses it as the source for the methanation plant to produce synthetic natural gas, which is injected in the blast furnace as reducing agent. The second concept is based on charcoal and syngas production through biomass pyrolysis. The former is pulverized and injected into the blast furnace, replacing part of the fossil coke used in the reference steelmaking plant. The latter is used as carbon source in the methanation stage, avoiding the carbon capture stage. Promising results are obtained for the concept which uses biomass as carbon source in the process, achieving a CO2 abatement cost of 64.5 €/tCO2. It is estimated that this cost could be reduced to 55.4 €/tCO2 by scale economy. Despite current economic challenges, the potential mid-term profitability, driven by the ongoing deployment of renewable energy, identifies the utilization of biomass as a solution for environmentally conscious steelmaking.

FuelVol. 409
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, European Commission, Gobierno de Aragón, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, European Social Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.