A descriptive, cross-sectional questionnaire based survey amongst the women regarding the adverse effects of sanitary pads

Objectives: Despite increased awareness of alternative options, sanitary pads remain the most popular period product among Indian women. However, extended use has been linked to side effects including allergic responses, infections, and psychological discomfort. The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of such effects, evaluate user comfort, and raise knowledge about the chemical composition of sanitary pads. Materials and Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional survey of 110 women aged 18–55 was conducted from June 20 to July 4, 2025. Participants completed a 31-item structured, self-administered questionnaire that included demographic information, menstrual product use, health outcomes, and suggestions for improvement. Women aged 18–45 who provided informed consent were eligible for inclusion. Pregnant and postmenopausal individuals were excluded. Results: Sanitary pads were the primary choice for 87.3% of respondents, with a notable 77.3% using them for over a decade. Skin irritation was reported by 62.7%, while 11.1% experienced bacterial or fungal infections. Despite recognizing chemical exposure risks and discomfort, 79.1% still considered sanitary pads the most comfortable product. Measures such as increasing pad change frequency and switching to unscented or alternative products alleviated symptoms for many. Awareness regarding product composition and health implications was moderate, with 60.7% expressing concern over chemical ingredients. Importantly, 50.5% of respondents were open to transitioning to alternative menstrual products if health outcomes improved. Conclusion: The findings underscore the need for reform in sanitary pad design, including chemical-free, hypoallergenic, and biodegradable options. Educational initiatives and safer menstrual product alternatives should be prioritized to promote health and well-being among menstruating individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cosmoderma
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/csdm_132_2025
Primary Topic
Menstrual Health and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A descriptive, cross-sectional questionnaire based survey amongst the women regarding the adverse effects of sanitary pads

Muhammed Muhammed, Arsha Anil Kumar, Nabeel Muhammed Rafi, Hiba Fathimathul Harshiba et al.
Cosmoderma
Menstrual Health and Disorders
article

A descriptive, cross-sectional questionnaire based survey amongst the women regarding the adverse effects of sanitary pads

Muhammed Muhammed, Arsha Anil Kumar, Nabeel Muhammed Rafi, Hiba Fathimathul Harshiba, Prasamsa Preman, Ruchi Sanjay Kumar Lanjewar
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Despite increased awareness of alternative options, sanitary pads remain the most popular period product among Indian women. However, extended use has been linked to side effects including allergic responses, infections, and psychological discomfort. The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of such effects, evaluate user comfort, and raise knowledge about the chemical composition of sanitary pads. Materials and Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional survey of 110 women aged 18–55 was conducted from June 20 to July 4, 2025. Participants completed a 31-item structured, self-administered questionnaire that included demographic information, menstrual product use, health outcomes, and suggestions for improvement. Women aged 18–45 who provided informed consent were eligible for inclusion. Pregnant and postmenopausal individuals were excluded. Results: Sanitary pads were the primary choice for 87.3% of respondents, with a notable 77.3% using them for over a decade. Skin irritation was reported by 62.7%, while 11.1% experienced bacterial or fungal infections. Despite recognizing chemical exposure risks and discomfort, 79.1% still considered sanitary pads the most comfortable product. Measures such as increasing pad change frequency and switching to unscented or alternative products alleviated symptoms for many. Awareness regarding product composition and health implications was moderate, with 60.7% expressing concern over chemical ingredients. Importantly, 50.5% of respondents were open to transitioning to alternative menstrual products if health outcomes improved. Conclusion: The findings underscore the need for reform in sanitary pad design, including chemical-free, hypoallergenic, and biodegradable options. Educational initiatives and safer menstrual product alternatives should be prioritized to promote health and well-being among menstruating individuals.

CosmodermaVol. 5
Kannur University (IN), Tbilisi State Medical University (GE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Menstrual Health and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.