Evaluating Text-to-Image Platforms' Content Moderation During the 2024 US Presidential Election

How do generative AI platforms’ content moderation policies handle the creation of political deepfakes? We evaluate how AI platforms mitigate this risk using an automated pipeline for politically diverse, externally valid evaluations of text-to-image (T2I) systems during the 2024 US Presidential election. Our system transformed media references to candidates into prompts for generative AI systems and sent prompts to three prominent T2I platforms each week for the final three months of the 2024 campaign. We first show that the platforms took fundamentally different approaches to content moderation, with little consistency in blocking behavior between platforms. We then show that there is little consistency in the blocking behavior within platforms over time. Almost no prompts were blocked in every week of our collection and Stability AI allowed almost all prompts featuring political figures until a sudden change two weeks before the 2024 election. Our findings highlight the importance of developing scalable context-specific approaches to monitoring T2I platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2025.021
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Text-to-Image Platforms' Content Moderation During the 2024 US Presidential Election

Jacob N. Shapiro, Sean T. Norton, Kevin Greene
Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
article

Evaluating Text-to-Image Platforms' Content Moderation During the 2024 US Presidential Election

Jacob N. Shapiro, Sean T. Norton, Kevin Greene
article en

Abstract

How do generative AI platforms’ content moderation policies handle the creation of political deepfakes? We evaluate how AI platforms mitigate this risk using an automated pipeline for politically diverse, externally valid evaluations of text-to-image (T2I) systems during the 2024 US Presidential election. Our system transformed media references to candidates into prompts for generative AI systems and sent prompts to three prominent T2I platforms each week for the final three months of the 2024 campaign. We first show that the platforms took fundamentally different approaches to content moderation, with little consistency in blocking behavior between platforms. We then show that there is little consistency in the blocking behavior within platforms over time. Almost no prompts were blocked in every week of our collection and Stability AI allowed almost all prompts featuring political figures until a sudden change two weeks before the 2024 election. Our findings highlight the importance of developing scalable context-specific approaches to monitoring T2I platforms.

Journal of Quantitative Description Digital MediaVol. 5
Princeton University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.