Dynamic analysis and simulation of the economic viability of sustainable aviation fuel blending in airlines: Emphasizing China's pilot policy and future development potential

The transition to Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) is a critical strategy for aligning China's aviation sector with global climate commitments. This study develops an integrated economic–environmental–energy complex-system framework for airlines and employs a system dynamics approach to simulate the economic viability and development potential of China's current SAF pilot policy, using Beijing as a case study. The model further explores optimized policy pathways. Key findings indicate that: (1) Airlines' economic contribution is highly vulnerable to external shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic; (2) While the existing 1 % SAF blending pilot policy is economically viable in the short term due to its limited adverse impact, its long-term sustainability is questionable as economic contribution begins to decline markedly after a post-pandemic inflection point; (3) Increasing the SAF blending ratio gradually erodes airline profits, as cost pressures from SAF adoption outweigh potential benefits like carbon emission reductions and partial cost pass-through to passengers, which is influenced by price elasticity of demand; (4) While a basic subsidy for SAF use is marginally effective, only when subsidies cover 70 % of SAF costs do airlines begin to recover profitability with SAF blending, albeit with diminishing returns over time; (5) An additional subsidy tied to emission reduction efficiency significantly enhances airlines' economic contribution, with more pronounced long-term benefits. Based on these results, the study proposes an integrated and flexible policy combining dual-subsidy and production-side cost-reduction measures to balance short-term transition needs with long-term fiscal sustainability. By integrating multidisciplinary perspectives and adopting a complex-system framework, this study offers theoretical and practical innovations—providing evidence-based insights for policymakers and airline managers in designing effective SAF transition strategies. • Analyzed the economic viability of airlines' SAF transition from a complex systems perspective. • Developed an airlines' economy-environment-energy (3 E) complex-system framework. • Constructed an SD model to integrate the dynamic feedback mechanisms within the 3 E system. • Focused on China's 1 % SAF blending pilot policy and the potential for further scaling up. • Developed a SAF “basic subsidy + additional subsidy' policy and identified key ratios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transport Policy
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103944
Primary Topic
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic analysis and simulation of the economic viability of sustainable aviation fuel blending in airlines: Emphasizing China's pilot policy and future development potential

Ming‐Guo Ma, Lijun Liang, Peirong Chen
Transport Policy
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
article

Dynamic analysis and simulation of the economic viability of sustainable aviation fuel blending in airlines: Emphasizing China's pilot policy and future development potential

Ming‐Guo Ma, Lijun Liang, Peirong Chen
article en

Abstract

The transition to Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) is a critical strategy for aligning China's aviation sector with global climate commitments. This study develops an integrated economic–environmental–energy complex-system framework for airlines and employs a system dynamics approach to simulate the economic viability and development potential of China's current SAF pilot policy, using Beijing as a case study. The model further explores optimized policy pathways. Key findings indicate that: (1) Airlines' economic contribution is highly vulnerable to external shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic; (2) While the existing 1 % SAF blending pilot policy is economically viable in the short term due to its limited adverse impact, its long-term sustainability is questionable as economic contribution begins to decline markedly after a post-pandemic inflection point; (3) Increasing the SAF blending ratio gradually erodes airline profits, as cost pressures from SAF adoption outweigh potential benefits like carbon emission reductions and partial cost pass-through to passengers, which is influenced by price elasticity of demand; (4) While a basic subsidy for SAF use is marginally effective, only when subsidies cover 70 % of SAF costs do airlines begin to recover profitability with SAF blending, albeit with diminishing returns over time; (5) An additional subsidy tied to emission reduction efficiency significantly enhances airlines' economic contribution, with more pronounced long-term benefits. Based on these results, the study proposes an integrated and flexible policy combining dual-subsidy and production-side cost-reduction measures to balance short-term transition needs with long-term fiscal sustainability. By integrating multidisciplinary perspectives and adopting a complex-system framework, this study offers theoretical and practical innovations—providing evidence-based insights for policymakers and airline managers in designing effective SAF transition strategies. • Analyzed the economic viability of airlines' SAF transition from a complex systems perspective. • Developed an airlines' economy-environment-energy (3 E) complex-system framework. • Constructed an SD model to integrate the dynamic feedback mechanisms within the 3 E system. • Focused on China's 1 % SAF blending pilot policy and the potential for further scaling up. • Developed a SAF “basic subsidy + additional subsidy' policy and identified key ratios.

Transport PolicyVol. 177
Beijing Information Science & Technology University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.