Interdisciplinarity of secondary osteons: relevance of bioarchaeological and palaeontological research in biomedical cortical bone histology studies

Secondary osteons are fundamental products of bone metabolic processes. They accumulate, crowd, and superimpose over themselves over the lifespan of the individual and capture significant biological, environmental, and even social information. They are crucial in biomedical research as a reflection of bone health and disease. Because bone preserves after death, secondary osteons offer a window into past human and animal lives. They are arguably one of very few biological traits that have been examined across multiple disciplines that work with modern and ancient samples. Here, we review articles indexed in PubMed that examine secondary osteons but span beyond biomedicine, such as palaeontology and bioarchaeology. We aim to identify commonalities and differences across these disciplines to highlight potential for exchange of existing complementary data and future collaborative avenues. We find that 9 % of articles reporting new secondary osteon data (622 obtained) represent archaeological or fossil material. The key shared positive outcome across these disciplines has been data and histology images that provide insights into age, sex, behaviour, species discrimination, and anatomical variation. The main limitations of using ancient samples are the unknown and thus estimated demographic information of human and animal remains studied, and artifacts of taphonomy and bioerosion seen in bone histology that originate from post-mortem, burial, and diagenetic processes, which are not present in biomedical samples. We conclude that a histological analysis of secondary osteons can be a versatile tool in different fields of bone research and encourage transdisciplinary collaboration to better improve our knowledge of bone remodelling processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bone Reports
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2025.101893
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interdisciplinarity of secondary osteons: relevance of bioarchaeological and palaeontological research in biomedical cortical bone histology studies

H. Reid, Karen M. Cooke, Justyna J. Miszkiewicz, Julien Louys
Bone Reports
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
article

Interdisciplinarity of secondary osteons: relevance of bioarchaeological and palaeontological research in biomedical cortical bone histology studies

H. Reid, Karen M. Cooke, Justyna J. Miszkiewicz, Julien Louys
article en

Abstract

Secondary osteons are fundamental products of bone metabolic processes. They accumulate, crowd, and superimpose over themselves over the lifespan of the individual and capture significant biological, environmental, and even social information. They are crucial in biomedical research as a reflection of bone health and disease. Because bone preserves after death, secondary osteons offer a window into past human and animal lives. They are arguably one of very few biological traits that have been examined across multiple disciplines that work with modern and ancient samples. Here, we review articles indexed in PubMed that examine secondary osteons but span beyond biomedicine, such as palaeontology and bioarchaeology. We aim to identify commonalities and differences across these disciplines to highlight potential for exchange of existing complementary data and future collaborative avenues. We find that 9 % of articles reporting new secondary osteon data (622 obtained) represent archaeological or fossil material. The key shared positive outcome across these disciplines has been data and histology images that provide insights into age, sex, behaviour, species discrimination, and anatomical variation. The main limitations of using ancient samples are the unknown and thus estimated demographic information of human and animal remains studied, and artifacts of taphonomy and bioerosion seen in bone histology that originate from post-mortem, burial, and diagenetic processes, which are not present in biomedical samples. We conclude that a histological analysis of secondary osteons can be a versatile tool in different fields of bone research and encourage transdisciplinary collaboration to better improve our knowledge of bone remodelling processes.

Bone ReportsVol. 28
Griffith University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.