Current Practice and Evidence for Endoscopic Spine Surgery

Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) represents a development in minimally invasive procedures, offering the potential benefits of reduced tissue disruption, shorter recovery times, and enhanced precision. This review traces the historical development of ESS, explores its core techniques-including transforaminal, interlaminar, and biportal approaches-and evaluates its role in treating conditions like herniated disks and spinal stenosis. By comparing clinical outcomes of ESS with standard open surgery, this article highlights the importance of patient selection, surgeon expertise, and evidence-based practice. Challenges, such as the steep learning curve, limitations in visualization, and risk of complications, are discussed, along with strategies for integrating ESS into modern spine care. The review concludes by identifying research gaps and opportunities for technological advancements, aiming to guide surgeons in adopting ESS and improving patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-24-01424
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current Practice and Evidence for Endoscopic Spine Surgery

Choll Kim, Alexander Richard Vaccaro, Stenberg Joseph, Christopher A. Yeung et al.
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Current Practice and Evidence for Endoscopic Spine Surgery

Choll Kim, Alexander Richard Vaccaro, Stenberg Joseph, Christopher A. Yeung, Kai‐Uwe Lewandrowski, Jason L. Pittman
article en

Abstract

Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) represents a development in minimally invasive procedures, offering the potential benefits of reduced tissue disruption, shorter recovery times, and enhanced precision. This review traces the historical development of ESS, explores its core techniques-including transforaminal, interlaminar, and biportal approaches-and evaluates its role in treating conditions like herniated disks and spinal stenosis. By comparing clinical outcomes of ESS with standard open surgery, this article highlights the importance of patient selection, surgeon expertise, and evidence-based practice. Challenges, such as the steep learning curve, limitations in visualization, and risk of complications, are discussed, along with strategies for integrating ESS into modern spine care. The review concludes by identifying research gaps and opportunities for technological advancements, aiming to guide surgeons in adopting ESS and improving patient outcomes.

Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsVol. 34(2)
Centre Alpien de Phytogéographie (CH), Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.