Factors influencing nurses’ involvement in decision-making in Jordanian governmental hospitals: A cross-sectional study

Decision-making is a vital aspect of nursing, influenced by factors like experience and specialty. The aim of study to assess the perceived level of decision-making involvement among Jordanian nurses and identify influencing factors. This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in 3 major governmental hospitals in Jordan. A convenient sampling method was employed to recruit a total of 230 Jordanian nurses currently working in various departments within these hospitals. Data were collected through an online self-administered questionnaire, specifically the Nursing Decision-Making Instrument (NDMI), which measures nurses' participation in clinical and organizational decision-making processes. The collected data were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient (Pearson's r) to examine the relationship between selected demographic and professional variables (e.g., years of experience, educational level, and department) and the nurses' levels of involvement in decision-making. The sample's age ranged from 22 to 54 years (mean = 32.95), and nursing experience spanned 1 to 22 years (mean = 12.35). Nurses managed an average workload of 14.76 patients per shift. Decision-making scores, as measured by the nursing decision-making instrument, ranged from 61 to 92, with a mean score of 71.76. The majority of participants (86.5%) demonstrated a flexible decision-making orientation, while the remaining 13.5% exhibited a more intuitive or analytical style. Statistical analyses revealed significant positive correlations between decision-making scores and age (r = 0.283), total nursing experience (r = 0.371), and departmental experience (r = 0.246). In contrast, workload showed a significant negative correlation with decision-making scores (r = -.460), suggesting that higher patient loads may hinder effective participation in decision-making. The study highlights the need to strengthen nurses' involvement in decision-making in Jordan. Findings suggest that nursing education should place greater emphasis on building decision-making skills through both training and experience. Health policies should support nurses' roles in clinical decisions, while workload management such as improving nurse-to-patient ratios can enhance their ability to make effective decisions. Empowering nurses in these areas is essential for improving patient care and overall healthcare outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000046071
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing nurses’ involvement in decision-making in Jordanian governmental hospitals: A cross-sectional study

Islam Ali Oweidat, Nadiah A. Baghdadi, Omaima Nassar, Khalid Al‐Mugheed et al.
Medicine
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Factors influencing nurses’ involvement in decision-making in Jordanian governmental hospitals: A cross-sectional study

Islam Ali Oweidat, Nadiah A. Baghdadi, Omaima Nassar, Khalid Al‐Mugheed, Ghada Abu Shosha, Sally Mohammed Farghaly Abdelaliem, Alaa Dalky, Huda R. Aboskoot
article en

Abstract

Decision-making is a vital aspect of nursing, influenced by factors like experience and specialty. The aim of study to assess the perceived level of decision-making involvement among Jordanian nurses and identify influencing factors. This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in 3 major governmental hospitals in Jordan. A convenient sampling method was employed to recruit a total of 230 Jordanian nurses currently working in various departments within these hospitals. Data were collected through an online self-administered questionnaire, specifically the Nursing Decision-Making Instrument (NDMI), which measures nurses' participation in clinical and organizational decision-making processes. The collected data were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient (Pearson's r) to examine the relationship between selected demographic and professional variables (e.g., years of experience, educational level, and department) and the nurses' levels of involvement in decision-making. The sample's age ranged from 22 to 54 years (mean = 32.95), and nursing experience spanned 1 to 22 years (mean = 12.35). Nurses managed an average workload of 14.76 patients per shift. Decision-making scores, as measured by the nursing decision-making instrument, ranged from 61 to 92, with a mean score of 71.76. The majority of participants (86.5%) demonstrated a flexible decision-making orientation, while the remaining 13.5% exhibited a more intuitive or analytical style. Statistical analyses revealed significant positive correlations between decision-making scores and age (r = 0.283), total nursing experience (r = 0.371), and departmental experience (r = 0.246). In contrast, workload showed a significant negative correlation with decision-making scores (r = -.460), suggesting that higher patient loads may hinder effective participation in decision-making. The study highlights the need to strengthen nurses' involvement in decision-making in Jordan. Findings suggest that nursing education should place greater emphasis on building decision-making skills through both training and experience. Health policies should support nurses' roles in clinical decisions, while workload management such as improving nurse-to-patient ratios can enhance their ability to make effective decisions. Empowering nurses in these areas is essential for improving patient care and overall healthcare outcomes.

MedicineVol. 104(49)
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), Zarqa University (JO), Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), Riyadh Elm University (SA), Ministry of Health (JO), Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.