Beliefs about EU 2030 climate commitments across public, expert, and policy audiences

Abstract The European Union (EU) has adopted ambitious climate policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 55% by 2030. While technical, economic, and political feasibility have been widely analyzed, far less is known about a critical enabling factor: whether key societal actors perceive these targets as credible and achievable. In this study, we elicit probabilistic beliefs about future EU emission reductions from a sample of citizens designed to be representative across 12 EU member states and compare them with the expectations of climate policymakers and experts. Our findings reveal that all three groups anticipate substantial progress compared to current levels. At the same time, citizens are more skeptical about achieving the target and substantially more uncertain than elites, expecting, on average, a 43% reduction by 2030 compared to the EU’s 55% reference. Moreover, we identify a notable misalignment: elites tend to systematically underestimate public skepticism. This gap underscores the need to improve policy communication, directly address citizens’ concerns, and foster a shared understanding to enhance the perceived credibility and political sustainability of the EU’s climate goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae491b
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beliefs about EU 2030 climate commitments across public, expert, and policy audiences

Silvia Pianta, Valentina Bosetti, Johannes Emmerling, Mary Sanford et al.
Environmental Research Letters
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Beliefs about EU 2030 climate commitments across public, expert, and policy audiences

Silvia Pianta, Valentina Bosetti, Johannes Emmerling, Mary Sanford, Loïc Berger, Nahed Eddai, Thomas Epper, Uyanga Turmunkh, Thibault Richard
article en

Abstract

Abstract The European Union (EU) has adopted ambitious climate policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 55% by 2030. While technical, economic, and political feasibility have been widely analyzed, far less is known about a critical enabling factor: whether key societal actors perceive these targets as credible and achievable. In this study, we elicit probabilistic beliefs about future EU emission reductions from a sample of citizens designed to be representative across 12 EU member states and compare them with the expectations of climate policymakers and experts. Our findings reveal that all three groups anticipate substantial progress compared to current levels. At the same time, citizens are more skeptical about achieving the target and substantially more uncertain than elites, expecting, on average, a 43% reduction by 2030 compared to the EU’s 55% reference. Moreover, we identify a notable misalignment: elites tend to systematically underestimate public skepticism. This gap underscores the need to improve policy communication, directly address citizens’ concerns, and foster a shared understanding to enhance the perceived credibility and political sustainability of the EU’s climate goals.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 21(5)
Université de Lille (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technique (CNRST) (MA), RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment (IT), CMCC Foundation - Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (IT), Institut d'Economie Scientifique Et de Gestion (FR), Lille Économie Management (FR), Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée (FR), Université de Strasbourg (FR), Bocconi University (IT), HEC Paris (FR), Université de Lorraine (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.