Impact of AIR™ Recon DL on magnetic resonance imaging-based quantitative brain structure measurements

We aimed to evaluate how the AIR™ Recon DL algorithm influences magentic resonance imaging (MRI) quality and quantitative brain morphometry relative to conventional reconstruction (CR). Seventy-four healthy adults underwent 3D T1-weighted MRI reconstructed with CR and AIR™ Recon DL. Image quality was rated by two neuroradiologists (κ = 0.74-0.97). Voxel-based morphometry assessed total, gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal (CSF) volumes; surface-based morphometry analyzed cortical thickness, sulcal depth, fractal dimension, and gyrification across 148 regions. Hippocampal volumes were extracted using the Neuromorphometrics atlas. Reconstruction times were compared. AIR™ Recon DL significantly improved image quality (reduced noise and artifacts, <i>P</i> < 0.001) but introduced systematic morphometric shifts-smaller total and WM volumes, larger GM and CSF volumes, and widespread regional thickness increases (effect sizes <i>d</i> ≈ 0.3-0.5). Hippocampal volumes increased bilaterally (ΔL = +0.15 mL, +3.97%; ΔR = +0.15 mL, +3.88%; both <i>P</i> < 0.05). Mean reconstruction time was longer for deep learning-based reconstruction (11.6 ± 1.6 s) than CR (9.9 ± 1.4 s; Δ = +1.7 s, <i>P</i> < 0.001). AIR™ Recon DL enhances image quality but causes modest, systematic volumetric biases. Harmonizing reconstruction methods is essential for reliable morphometric comparisons in neuropsychiatric imaging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychoradiology
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/psyrad/kkaf036
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of AIR™ Recon DL on magnetic resonance imaging-based quantitative brain structure measurements

Tengteng Fan, Kai Yuan, Hong Wei, Shufei Feng et al.
Psychoradiology
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
article

Impact of AIR™ Recon DL on magnetic resonance imaging-based quantitative brain structure measurements

Tengteng Fan, Kai Yuan, Hong Wei, Shufei Feng, Xiao Lin, Wenqing Cai, Peng Li, Yuxin Zhang, Na Hu, Ping Cao, Yang Deng
article en

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate how the AIR™ Recon DL algorithm influences magentic resonance imaging (MRI) quality and quantitative brain morphometry relative to conventional reconstruction (CR). Seventy-four healthy adults underwent 3D T1-weighted MRI reconstructed with CR and AIR™ Recon DL. Image quality was rated by two neuroradiologists (κ = 0.74-0.97). Voxel-based morphometry assessed total, gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal (CSF) volumes; surface-based morphometry analyzed cortical thickness, sulcal depth, fractal dimension, and gyrification across 148 regions. Hippocampal volumes were extracted using the Neuromorphometrics atlas. Reconstruction times were compared. AIR™ Recon DL significantly improved image quality (reduced noise and artifacts, <i>P</i> < 0.001) but introduced systematic morphometric shifts-smaller total and WM volumes, larger GM and CSF volumes, and widespread regional thickness increases (effect sizes <i>d</i> ≈ 0.3-0.5). Hippocampal volumes increased bilaterally (ΔL = +0.15 mL, +3.97%; ΔR = +0.15 mL, +3.88%; both <i>P</i> < 0.05). Mean reconstruction time was longer for deep learning-based reconstruction (11.6 ± 1.6 s) than CR (9.9 ± 1.4 s; Δ = +1.7 s, <i>P</i> < 0.001). AIR™ Recon DL enhances image quality but causes modest, systematic volumetric biases. Harmonizing reconstruction methods is essential for reliable morphometric comparisons in neuropsychiatric imaging.

PsychoradiologyVol. 6
Peking University (CN), Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Peking University Sixth Hospital (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.