Remotely Delivered Clinical Trials in Older Adults: The Future of Inclusive Research?

Abstract Background Older people are still not included in many clinical trials resulting in a poor evidence base for older people’s medicine. Remote trial delivery represents a way to improve this. Despite recent advances in technology, there is a lack of research regarding participants’ perspectives on remote research delivery. This study aimed to compare remote physical performance and anthropometric measurements to those taken in-person, and to present participant perspectives on remote trials, utilising findings from the remotely delivered PROMOTe trial. Methods All trial participants (n=72) were invited to complete questionnaire. A subset was invited to attend an in-person visit within 48hours of final video-visit. Bland-Altman plots (95% limits of agreement [LOA]) were employed to compare weight, height, grip strength, and chair-stand time. Results Fifty-eight (81%) participants completed the questionnaire (age mean 73.3 years, SD 5.0). Over half (31/58, 54%) had no preference between remote or in-person participation. Of those who preferred remote participation, a majority (5/7, 71.4%) stated this was to avoid travel. Of those who preferred in-person, a majority stated they liked to talk to staff face-to-face. Sixteen individuals attended in-person validation visits (age mean 75 years, SD 1.7). All (32/32, 100%) measurements of chair stand time, weight, gait-speed and overall short physical performance battery score and 94% (30/32) of measurements of height and grip strength fell within LOA, and there were no statistically significant within person differences between remote and in–person measurements. Conclusion Most participants found remote trial delivery both acceptable and manageable. Remotely measured physical performance was highly comparable to in person, supporting use of remote physical measurements in older adults. It should not be assumed that older people will not be able to manage technology or other aspects of remote trial delivery. Researchers should aim for flexible, responsive study designs ensuring the inclusion of older people.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf318.012
Primary Topic
Technology Use by Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remotely Delivered Clinical Trials in Older Adults: The Future of Inclusive Research?

Claire J. Steves, Ruth C. E. Bowyer, María Paz García, Kevin Whelan et al.
Age and Ageing
Technology Use by Older Adults
article

Remotely Delivered Clinical Trials in Older Adults: The Future of Inclusive Research?

Claire J. Steves, Ruth C. E. Bowyer, María Paz García, Kevin Whelan, Mary Ní Lochlainn, Wiktoria Milczanowska, Giulia Raffaele
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Older people are still not included in many clinical trials resulting in a poor evidence base for older people’s medicine. Remote trial delivery represents a way to improve this. Despite recent advances in technology, there is a lack of research regarding participants’ perspectives on remote research delivery. This study aimed to compare remote physical performance and anthropometric measurements to those taken in-person, and to present participant perspectives on remote trials, utilising findings from the remotely delivered PROMOTe trial. Methods All trial participants (n=72) were invited to complete questionnaire. A subset was invited to attend an in-person visit within 48hours of final video-visit. Bland-Altman plots (95% limits of agreement [LOA]) were employed to compare weight, height, grip strength, and chair-stand time. Results Fifty-eight (81%) participants completed the questionnaire (age mean 73.3 years, SD 5.0). Over half (31/58, 54%) had no preference between remote or in-person participation. Of those who preferred remote participation, a majority (5/7, 71.4%) stated this was to avoid travel. Of those who preferred in-person, a majority stated they liked to talk to staff face-to-face. Sixteen individuals attended in-person validation visits (age mean 75 years, SD 1.7). All (32/32, 100%) measurements of chair stand time, weight, gait-speed and overall short physical performance battery score and 94% (30/32) of measurements of height and grip strength fell within LOA, and there were no statistically significant within person differences between remote and in–person measurements. Conclusion Most participants found remote trial delivery both acceptable and manageable. Remotely measured physical performance was highly comparable to in person, supporting use of remote physical measurements in older adults. It should not be assumed that older people will not be able to manage technology or other aspects of remote trial delivery. Researchers should aim for flexible, responsive study designs ensuring the inclusion of older people.

Age and AgeingVol. 54(Supplement_4)
King's College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Technology Use by Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.