Documentation and Discussion Patterns of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Decisions in Frail Adults

Abstract Background With cardiac arrest, the probability of survival-to-discharge diminishes with increasing morbidity. Discussion and documentation of ceilings of care are essential, as advanced age should not disqualify patients from resuscitation attempts. We audited documentation and communication adherence as per our Hospital’s "Do Not Attempt Resuscitation" (DNAR) policy. Methods We prospectively reviewed records of inpatients aged ≥65y admitted to our 70 acute and 20 rehabilitation beds between August 2024 and January 2025. All had admissions ≥48 hours. Baseline patient characteristics and DNAR decision factors were collected. Temporal patterns and DNAR documentation were assessed at three time-points: ≤48h, between 48h and 7 days, and >7 days. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with incomplete DNAR forms. Results Of 289 adults admitted to our wards, 48 had a DNAR form completed [70.8% female; median age: 85.5y; median clinical frailty scale: 6 (IQR: 5-7)]. Most common reasons for admission were falls and sepsis (41.6%). Within 48 hours of admission, 60.4% of DNAR decisions were recorded. Decisions were based on clinical judgement (45.8%) and patient preferences or advance directives (22.9%). Rationale was not documented in one-third. The clinical team signed and dated 97.9% of DNAR forms while nursing staff signed only 18 (37.5%). In 16.7% cases, communication to patients and/or relatives around the treatment escalation plan and DNAR decision was completed. Males (Odds ratio (OR): 2.24; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23-21.14), early-documentation (≤48h) of DNAR (OR: 3.6; 95% CI; 0.58-22.01), higher frailty (frailty scale ≥6) (OR: 4; (95% CI:0.65-24.54) were more likely to have incomplete documentation, yet statistically insignificant (P value > 0.05). Conclusion We found suboptimal documentation of important decisions around DNAR in a cohort with high comorbidity burden. Continuous education and compliance promotion of DNAR documentation on our wards is necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf318.077
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Documentation and Discussion Patterns of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Decisions in Frail Adults

Amit Thapa, Elhussein A. Elhassan, Muhammad Arif Mohd Sofee, Ciarán Donegan et al.
Age and Ageing
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Documentation and Discussion Patterns of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Decisions in Frail Adults

Amit Thapa, Elhussein A. Elhassan, Muhammad Arif Mohd Sofee, Ciarán Donegan, Alan Moore, Linda Brewer, Carmel Curran, Orla Connaughton
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background With cardiac arrest, the probability of survival-to-discharge diminishes with increasing morbidity. Discussion and documentation of ceilings of care are essential, as advanced age should not disqualify patients from resuscitation attempts. We audited documentation and communication adherence as per our Hospital’s "Do Not Attempt Resuscitation" (DNAR) policy. Methods We prospectively reviewed records of inpatients aged ≥65y admitted to our 70 acute and 20 rehabilitation beds between August 2024 and January 2025. All had admissions ≥48 hours. Baseline patient characteristics and DNAR decision factors were collected. Temporal patterns and DNAR documentation were assessed at three time-points: ≤48h, between 48h and 7 days, and >7 days. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with incomplete DNAR forms. Results Of 289 adults admitted to our wards, 48 had a DNAR form completed [70.8% female; median age: 85.5y; median clinical frailty scale: 6 (IQR: 5-7)]. Most common reasons for admission were falls and sepsis (41.6%). Within 48 hours of admission, 60.4% of DNAR decisions were recorded. Decisions were based on clinical judgement (45.8%) and patient preferences or advance directives (22.9%). Rationale was not documented in one-third. The clinical team signed and dated 97.9% of DNAR forms while nursing staff signed only 18 (37.5%). In 16.7% cases, communication to patients and/or relatives around the treatment escalation plan and DNAR decision was completed. Males (Odds ratio (OR): 2.24; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23-21.14), early-documentation (≤48h) of DNAR (OR: 3.6; 95% CI; 0.58-22.01), higher frailty (frailty scale ≥6) (OR: 4; (95% CI:0.65-24.54) were more likely to have incomplete documentation, yet statistically insignificant (P value > 0.05). Conclusion We found suboptimal documentation of important decisions around DNAR in a cohort with high comorbidity burden. Continuous education and compliance promotion of DNAR documentation on our wards is necessary.

Age and AgeingVol. 54(Supplement_4)
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE), Beaumont Hospital (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.