Validity of the Spanish version of the quick mild cognitive impairment screen (Q <i>mci</i> -S)

BackgroundAccurate, short, cognitive screening instruments are important for identifying mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia including Alzheimer's disease. The Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Q<i>mci</i>) screen, given its brevity, may be useful in this setting but it has not been validated in Spanish.ObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Spanish version (Q<i>mci</i>-S) to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).MethodsPatients aged ≥55 years were recruited from six Primary Care Teams in Barcelona, Spain, between 2018-2019. Dementia, MCI, and normal cognition (NC) were classified following neuropsychological testing, independent of the Q<i>mci</i>-S and MoCA scores. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), adjusted for age and education.ResultsIn total, 337 patients were included, mean 77.9 years, standard deviation (SD) ± 6.9. Most were female (57.3%). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the Q<i>mci</i>-S was excellent (0.98). The Q<i>mci</i>-S had good to excellent diagnostic accuracy for separating NC from MCI and dementia (AUC 0.91) and was statistically greater than the MoCA (AUC 0.86), p = 0.029. Accuracy was similar for differentiating NC from MCI and MCI from dementia. The Q<i>mci</i>-S had a shorter administer time, mean 8.6 (±3.2) versus 12.75 (SD ±5.5) minutes, respectively, p < 0.001.ConclusionsThe newly developed Q<i>mci</i>-S screen showed excellent criterion, construct and concurrent validity versus the widely used MoCA and had statistically similar, good to excellent, diagnostic accuracy for cognitive impairment. Its significantly shorter administration time suggests it may be the better screen in a Spanish speaking population in primary care, though further research is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251400791
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity of the Spanish version of the quick mild cognitive impairment screen (Q mci -S)

Olga Vázquez‐Ibar, Rónán Ó’Caoimh, Francesc Orfila, Nuria Leiva-Bañuelos et al.
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Validity of the Spanish version of the quick mild cognitive impairment screen (Q mci -S)

Olga Vázquez‐Ibar, Rónán Ó’Caoimh, Francesc Orfila, Nuria Leiva-Bañuelos, D. William Molloy
article en

Abstract

BackgroundAccurate, short, cognitive screening instruments are important for identifying mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia including Alzheimer's disease. The Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Q<i>mci</i>) screen, given its brevity, may be useful in this setting but it has not been validated in Spanish.ObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Spanish version (Q<i>mci</i>-S) to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).MethodsPatients aged ≥55 years were recruited from six Primary Care Teams in Barcelona, Spain, between 2018-2019. Dementia, MCI, and normal cognition (NC) were classified following neuropsychological testing, independent of the Q<i>mci</i>-S and MoCA scores. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), adjusted for age and education.ResultsIn total, 337 patients were included, mean 77.9 years, standard deviation (SD) ± 6.9. Most were female (57.3%). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the Q<i>mci</i>-S was excellent (0.98). The Q<i>mci</i>-S had good to excellent diagnostic accuracy for separating NC from MCI and dementia (AUC 0.91) and was statistically greater than the MoCA (AUC 0.86), p = 0.029. Accuracy was similar for differentiating NC from MCI and MCI from dementia. The Q<i>mci</i>-S had a shorter administer time, mean 8.6 (±3.2) versus 12.75 (SD ±5.5) minutes, respectively, p < 0.001.ConclusionsThe newly developed Q<i>mci</i>-S screen showed excellent criterion, construct and concurrent validity versus the widely used MoCA and had statistically similar, good to excellent, diagnostic accuracy for cognitive impairment. Its significantly shorter administration time suggests it may be the better screen in a Spanish speaking population in primary care, though further research is required.

Journal of Alzheimer s DiseaseVol. 109(2)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), University College Cork (IE), Health Research Board (IE), Mercy University Hospital (IE), Agència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya (ES), Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (ES), Hospital Del Mar (ES), Institut Català de la Salut (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.