Lyric beyond Containment

This introduction to the special issue Lyric beyond Containment does not propose to redefine lyric. Nor does it seek to inaugurate a new turn in literary criticism; this is not the “new new lyric studies.” Instead, it argues that lyric tropes, such as the speaking “I,” the address to an absent or anthropomorphized other, or the brief glimpse of finely wrought feeling, prove fruitful in theorizing material, historical, political, and literary forms of subjectivity, personhood, relationality, and reciprocity. Whereas these tropes have too often been yoked to the decontextualized figure of the poetic speaker, this introduction suggests that they are vital tools for moving beyond notions of the poem as a closed aesthetic object, held apart from society. Moreover, these tropes occur across a broad range of genres, which are themselves illuminated through engagement with lyric theory. Building on important scholarship by critics including Julia Bloch, Jonathan Culler, Andy Hines, Virginia Jackson, Kamran Javadizadeh, Anthony Reed, Dorothy Wang, and Gillian White, the authors suggest that in lyric, and in lyric reading, language’s opacity contains generative possibilities for the theorization of social relations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
differences
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-12023578
Primary Topic
Poetry Analysis and Criticism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lyric beyond Containment

Sarah Dowling, Claire Grandy
differences
Poetry Analysis and Criticism
article

Lyric beyond Containment

Sarah Dowling, Claire Grandy
article en

Abstract

This introduction to the special issue Lyric beyond Containment does not propose to redefine lyric. Nor does it seek to inaugurate a new turn in literary criticism; this is not the “new new lyric studies.” Instead, it argues that lyric tropes, such as the speaking “I,” the address to an absent or anthropomorphized other, or the brief glimpse of finely wrought feeling, prove fruitful in theorizing material, historical, political, and literary forms of subjectivity, personhood, relationality, and reciprocity. Whereas these tropes have too often been yoked to the decontextualized figure of the poetic speaker, this introduction suggests that they are vital tools for moving beyond notions of the poem as a closed aesthetic object, held apart from society. Moreover, these tropes occur across a broad range of genres, which are themselves illuminated through engagement with lyric theory. Building on important scholarship by critics including Julia Bloch, Jonathan Culler, Andy Hines, Virginia Jackson, Kamran Javadizadeh, Anthony Reed, Dorothy Wang, and Gillian White, the authors suggest that in lyric, and in lyric reading, language’s opacity contains generative possibilities for the theorization of social relations.

differencesVol. 36(2-3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Poetry Analysis and Criticism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.