A cluster-randomized trial of household vs incentive-based tuberculosis contact investigation in rural South Africa: implementation reach

The World Health Organization recommends TB contact investigation in high-burden countries. We examined the implementation reach of two contact investigation strategies in South Africa. Kharitode TB, a cluster-randomized crossover trial, compared household- and incentive-based contact investigation in 28 clinics (July 2016-January 2020). Clinics used each strategy for 18 months (separated by a six-month "washout"). Adults recently diagnosed with TB (index participants) were enrolled. In the household-based arm, contact persons were screened and provided sputum samples at home. In the incentive-based arm, index participants distributed referral coupons to their contacts, who received a $3.50 incentive upon presenting for screening at clinics. We used mixed-effects logistic regression with random intercepts for clinics to examine factors associated with index participant enrollment and sputum collection from contact persons. In the household-based arm, 782/1,269 (61.6%) index participants consented, 1,882 contact persons were enrolled and sputum samples were collected from 988/1,882 (52.5%). In the incentive-based arm, 780/1,295 (60.2%) index participants consented, 1,940 contact persons were enrolled and sputum was collected from 1,431/1,940 (73.8%). Index participants living with HIV (adjusted odds ratio, aOR=0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.83) or unknown HIV status (aOR=0.12, 95% CI 0.07-0.20) were less likely to participate in the study. Contact persons in the incentive-based arm were more likely to provide a sputum sample compared to those in the household-based arm (aOR=2.12, 95% CI 1.80-2.50). Regardless of the study arm, cough (aOR=2.27, 95% CI 1.87-2.77), current smoking (aOR=2.22, 95% CI 1.63-3.02), and living with HIV (aOR=1.89, 95% CI 1.36-3.62) were associated with higher likelihood of sputum collection. There were gaps in implementation reach at the stages of contacting and enrolling index participants, enrolling individuals with HIV, and obtaining sputum, especially among those under 18 years and household contact persons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005580
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A cluster-randomized trial of household vs incentive-based tuberculosis contact investigation in rural South Africa: implementation reach

Bareng A. S. Nonyane, David W. Dowdy, Neil Alexander Martinson, Colleen F. Hanrahan et al.
PLOS Global Public Health
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
article

A cluster-randomized trial of household vs incentive-based tuberculosis contact investigation in rural South Africa: implementation reach

Bareng A. S. Nonyane, David W. Dowdy, Neil Alexander Martinson, Colleen F. Hanrahan, Eteri Machavariani, Samyra R. Cox, Tinatin Gvelesiani
article en

Abstract

The World Health Organization recommends TB contact investigation in high-burden countries. We examined the implementation reach of two contact investigation strategies in South Africa. Kharitode TB, a cluster-randomized crossover trial, compared household- and incentive-based contact investigation in 28 clinics (July 2016-January 2020). Clinics used each strategy for 18 months (separated by a six-month "washout"). Adults recently diagnosed with TB (index participants) were enrolled. In the household-based arm, contact persons were screened and provided sputum samples at home. In the incentive-based arm, index participants distributed referral coupons to their contacts, who received a $3.50 incentive upon presenting for screening at clinics. We used mixed-effects logistic regression with random intercepts for clinics to examine factors associated with index participant enrollment and sputum collection from contact persons. In the household-based arm, 782/1,269 (61.6%) index participants consented, 1,882 contact persons were enrolled and sputum samples were collected from 988/1,882 (52.5%). In the incentive-based arm, 780/1,295 (60.2%) index participants consented, 1,940 contact persons were enrolled and sputum was collected from 1,431/1,940 (73.8%). Index participants living with HIV (adjusted odds ratio, aOR=0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.83) or unknown HIV status (aOR=0.12, 95% CI 0.07-0.20) were less likely to participate in the study. Contact persons in the incentive-based arm were more likely to provide a sputum sample compared to those in the household-based arm (aOR=2.12, 95% CI 1.80-2.50). Regardless of the study arm, cough (aOR=2.27, 95% CI 1.87-2.77), current smoking (aOR=2.22, 95% CI 1.63-3.02), and living with HIV (aOR=1.89, 95% CI 1.36-3.62) were associated with higher likelihood of sputum collection. There were gaps in implementation reach at the stages of contacting and enrolling index participants, enrolling individuals with HIV, and obtaining sputum, especially among those under 18 years and household contact persons.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 5(12)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Perinatal HIV Research Unit (ZA), New York University (US), Tbilisi State Medical University (GE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.