Evaluating landsat time series of above-ground biomass to monitor boreal forest recovery following different types of disturbance

Global changes are exerting uncertain effects on boreal forest dynamics, highlighting the need for accurate methods to monitor above-ground biomass (AGB). Numerous studies have developed AGB estimation models based on Landsat reflectance and then applied these models across time series. However, only few studies provide an accuracy assessment of the resulting AGB time series using field plot data, limiting the ability to evaluate their applicability and highlight potential constraints. We developed AGB maps using a two-phase approach combining wall-to-wall airborne LiDAR point cloud data, winter and summer Landsat composites time series and Unet convolutional neural networks. This 36 years AGB time series (1985–2020) was evaluated using over 3,000 permanent sample plots with periodic measurement. The accuracy assessment of the produced maps indicates an R2 of 0.50 and RMSE of 33 t/ha. Analyses of dynamics after severe disturbance (harvesting and fires) reveal a close similarity in trajectories between permanent sample plots and predicted AGB values (Pearson correlation of 0.93). The maps enabled identifying stands where recovery failed, highlighting potential of this approach for monitoring disturbance recovery. When comparing our method to NBR spectral recovery, we found that Unet-based AGB provided a more realistic approach for monitoring structural recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2025.2587489
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating landsat time series of above-ground biomass to monitor boreal forest recovery following different types of disturbance

Martin Béland, Jean‐François Côté, Pauline Perbet, Luc Guindon
Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

Evaluating landsat time series of above-ground biomass to monitor boreal forest recovery following different types of disturbance

Martin Béland, Jean‐François Côté, Pauline Perbet, Luc Guindon
article en

Abstract

Global changes are exerting uncertain effects on boreal forest dynamics, highlighting the need for accurate methods to monitor above-ground biomass (AGB). Numerous studies have developed AGB estimation models based on Landsat reflectance and then applied these models across time series. However, only few studies provide an accuracy assessment of the resulting AGB time series using field plot data, limiting the ability to evaluate their applicability and highlight potential constraints. We developed AGB maps using a two-phase approach combining wall-to-wall airborne LiDAR point cloud data, winter and summer Landsat composites time series and Unet convolutional neural networks. This 36 years AGB time series (1985–2020) was evaluated using over 3,000 permanent sample plots with periodic measurement. The accuracy assessment of the produced maps indicates an R2 of 0.50 and RMSE of 33 t/ha. Analyses of dynamics after severe disturbance (harvesting and fires) reveal a close similarity in trajectories between permanent sample plots and predicted AGB values (Pearson correlation of 0.93). The maps enabled identifying stands where recovery failed, highlighting potential of this approach for monitoring disturbance recovery. When comparing our method to NBR spectral recovery, we found that Unet-based AGB provided a more realistic approach for monitoring structural recovery.

Canadian Journal of Remote SensingVol. 51(1)
Canadian Forest Service (CA), Natural Resources Canada (CA), Forest Research (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.