Audio Deepfake Detection Under Post-Processing Attack

Generalizable audio deepfake detection is a challenging task. Simple post-processing attacks like background noise or impulse response can significantly affect the performance of the detectors. We analysed the effects of 13 post-processing attacks on two detectors, one with a SSL (Self-Supervised Learning)-based front-end (Wav2Vec 2.0) the other using SincNet for feature extraction. Both detectors showed significant performance degradation when applying the post-processing attacks. For instance, we calculated an EER of 0.73% on the original data of the in-the-wild dataset using the SSL-based detector. The performance dropped to 4.37% after applying impulse response. To find the most effective attacks, we analysed the effects of post-processing on their signal quality using UTMOS. Additionally, we explored retraining strategies, improving the overall performance of our detectors by an EER of 0.22% and 0.33%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23919/eusipco63237.2025.11226066
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Media Forensic Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Audio Deepfake Detection Under Post-Processing Attack

Karla Schäfer, Jeongeun Choi, Martin Steinebach
1 citations
Digital Media Forensic Detection
1.28
article

Audio Deepfake Detection Under Post-Processing Attack

Karla Schäfer, Jeongeun Choi, Martin Steinebach
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Generalizable audio deepfake detection is a challenging task. Simple post-processing attacks like background noise or impulse response can significantly affect the performance of the detectors. We analysed the effects of 13 post-processing attacks on two detectors, one with a SSL (Self-Supervised Learning)-based front-end (Wav2Vec 2.0) the other using SincNet for feature extraction. Both detectors showed significant performance degradation when applying the post-processing attacks. For instance, we calculated an EER of 0.73% on the original data of the in-the-wild dataset using the SSL-based detector. The performance dropped to 4.37% after applying impulse response. To find the most effective attacks, we analysed the effects of post-processing on their signal quality using UTMOS. Additionally, we explored retraining strategies, improving the overall performance of our detectors by an EER of 0.22% and 0.33%.

Fraunhofer Institute for Secure Information Technology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Digital Media Forensic Detection
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.