Understanding the Research-Practice Gap in Visualization Design Guidelines

Empirical research on perception and cognition has laid the foundation for visualization design, often distilled into practical guidelines intended to support effective chart creation. However, it remains unclear how well these research-driven insights are reflected in the guidelines practitioners actually use. In this paper, we investigate the research-practice gap in visualization design guidelines through a mixed-methods approach. We first collected design guidelines from practitioner-facing sources and empirical studies from academic venues to assess their alignment. To complement this analysis, we conducted surveys and interviews with practitioners and researchers to examine their experiences, perceptions, and challenges surrounding the development and use of design guidelines. Our findings reveal misalignment between empirical evidence and widely used guidelines, differing perspectives between communities, and key barriers that contribute to the persistence of the research-practice gap.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2025.3640072
Primary Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Research-Practice Gap in Visualization Design Guidelines

Nam Wook Kim, Changhoon Oh, Yoonsuh Cho, Jinhan Choi et al.
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Data Visualization and Analytics
article

Understanding the Research-Practice Gap in Visualization Design Guidelines

Nam Wook Kim, Changhoon Oh, Yoonsuh Cho, Jinhan Choi, Grace Myers, Yea‐Seul Kim
article en

Abstract

Empirical research on perception and cognition has laid the foundation for visualization design, often distilled into practical guidelines intended to support effective chart creation. However, it remains unclear how well these research-driven insights are reflected in the guidelines practitioners actually use. In this paper, we investigate the research-practice gap in visualization design guidelines through a mixed-methods approach. We first collected design guidelines from practitioner-facing sources and empirical studies from academic venues to assess their alignment. To complement this analysis, we conducted surveys and interviews with practitioners and researchers to examine their experiences, perceptions, and challenges surrounding the development and use of design guidelines. Our findings reveal misalignment between empirical evidence and widely used guidelines, differing perspectives between communities, and key barriers that contribute to the persistence of the research-practice gap.

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer GraphicsVol. 32(3)
Boston College (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Yonsei University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Data Visualization and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.