Independent Validation of a Machine Learning Classifier for Predicting Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Routinely Obtainable [18F]FDG-PET/CT Parameters

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET/CT is limited in pretherapeutic lymph node (LN) staging by false-positives. We previously demonstrated that a machine learning (ML) classifier using routine [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET/CT and clinical variables can improve diagnostic accuracy compared to visual assessment. The present study aimed at independent validation. Cohort 1 (Charité) included 87 NSCLC patients (surgical and non-surgical), prospectively enrolled at our institution. Cohort 2 (TCIA) comprised 124 patients with primary surgery from the multi-institution NSCLC Radiogenomics dataset. Our ML classifier for differentiating N0/1 vs. N2/3 status was applied without modification. As comparator, the combined standard PET/CT criterion of "mediastinal LN uptake > mediastinum and/or short-axis > 10 mm" was used. Histology of N2/3 LNs served as reference standard. Prevalence of pN2/3 differed significantly between cohorts (Charité: 40%, TCIA: 12%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Specificity was similar between ML and the standard PET/CT criterion in the Charité cohort (65% vs. 60%; <i>p</i> = 0.5) but significantly higher with ML in TCIA (90% vs. 70%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Sensitivity for pN2/3 was comparable between the two comparators in both the Charité cohort (97% each; <i>p</i> = 1.0) and TCIA (27% vs. 33%; <i>p</i> = 1.0). Lower sensitivity in TCIA patients reflects the preselection of surgical patients who had already been clinically staged and deemed suitable for surgery. The diagnostic performance of the ML classifier and its (potentially) superior specificity were thus successfully validated in two independent cohorts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32120679
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Independent Validation of a Machine Learning Classifier for Predicting Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Routinely Obtainable [18F]FDG-PET/CT Parameters

Tobias Penzkofer, Manuela Gerhold, Georg Lukas Baumgaertner, Agata Wdowiak et al.
Current Oncology
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Independent Validation of a Machine Learning Classifier for Predicting Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Routinely Obtainable [18F]FDG-PET/CT Parameters

Tobias Penzkofer, Manuela Gerhold, Georg Lukas Baumgaertner, Agata Wdowiak, Julian M.M. Rogasch, Holger Amthauer, Nikolaj Frost, Sebastian Ochsenreither, Mareike Graff, Jens Neudecker, Christian Furth, Jens‐Carsten Rückert, Bernd Schmidt
article en

Abstract

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET/CT is limited in pretherapeutic lymph node (LN) staging by false-positives. We previously demonstrated that a machine learning (ML) classifier using routine [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET/CT and clinical variables can improve diagnostic accuracy compared to visual assessment. The present study aimed at independent validation. Cohort 1 (Charité) included 87 NSCLC patients (surgical and non-surgical), prospectively enrolled at our institution. Cohort 2 (TCIA) comprised 124 patients with primary surgery from the multi-institution NSCLC Radiogenomics dataset. Our ML classifier for differentiating N0/1 vs. N2/3 status was applied without modification. As comparator, the combined standard PET/CT criterion of "mediastinal LN uptake > mediastinum and/or short-axis > 10 mm" was used. Histology of N2/3 LNs served as reference standard. Prevalence of pN2/3 differed significantly between cohorts (Charité: 40%, TCIA: 12%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Specificity was similar between ML and the standard PET/CT criterion in the Charité cohort (65% vs. 60%; <i>p</i> = 0.5) but significantly higher with ML in TCIA (90% vs. 70%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Sensitivity for pN2/3 was comparable between the two comparators in both the Charité cohort (97% each; <i>p</i> = 1.0) and TCIA (27% vs. 33%; <i>p</i> = 1.0). Lower sensitivity in TCIA patients reflects the preselection of surgical patients who had already been clinically staged and deemed suitable for surgery. The diagnostic performance of the ML classifier and its (potentially) superior specificity were thus successfully validated in two independent cohorts.

Current OncologyVol. 32(12)
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), DRK Kliniken Berlin (DE), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Kantonsspital Aarau (CH), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.