Robustly Stable Accelerated Momentum Methods with a Near-Optimal L2 Gain and H∞ Performance

We consider the problem of minimizing a strongly convex smooth function where the gradients are subject to additive worst-case deterministic errors that are square summable. We study the trade-offs between the convergence rate and robustness to gradient errors when designing the parameters of a first-order algorithm. We focus on a general class of momentum methods (GMM) with constant step size and two momentum parameters that can recover gradient descent (GD), Nesterov’s accelerated gradient (NAG), the heavy-ball (HB) method, and the triple-momentum method as special cases. We measure the robustness of an algorithm in terms of the cumulative suboptimality in function values over the iterations normalized by the squared [Formula: see text] norm of the gradient errors. This quantity can be interpreted as the (squared) [Formula: see text] gain of a dynamical system that represents the GMM iterations where the input is the gradient error sequence and the output is a weighted distance to the optimum. For quadratic objectives, we compute the [Formula: see text] gain by explicitly leveraging its representation as the [Formula: see text] norm of the GMM system in the frequency domain and construct gradient errors that lead to worst-case performance explicitly. We also study the stability of GMM with respect to multiplicative errors by characterizing the structured real and stability radius of the GMM system through their connections to the [Formula: see text] norm. This allows us to compare GD, HB, and NAG methods in terms of robustness and argue that HB is not as robust as NAG, despite being the fastest in terms of the rate. We then develop the robustly stable HB method that can be faster than NAG while being at the best robustness level possible. We also propose the robustly stable GD that is the fastest version of GD with constant step size while being at the best robustness level. In addition, we extend our framework to general strongly convex smooth objectives, providing nonasymptotic rate results for inexact GMMs and bounds on the [Formula: see text] gain where we can choose the GMM parameters to systematically trade off the rate to robustness in a computationally tractable framework. Finally, we discuss how our results can be extended to more general noise that can be stochastic. Funding: This work was funded in part by the Office of Naval Research [Grants N00014-21-1-2244 and N00014-24-12628] and the National Science Foundation [Grant DMS-2053485]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2023.0321 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics of Operations Research
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2023.0321
Primary Topic
Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robustly Stable Accelerated Momentum Methods with a Near-Optimal L2 Gain and H∞ Performance

Mert Gürbüzbalaban
Mathematics of Operations Research
Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
article

Robustly Stable Accelerated Momentum Methods with a Near-Optimal L2 Gain and H∞ Performance

Mert Gürbüzbalaban
article en

Abstract

We consider the problem of minimizing a strongly convex smooth function where the gradients are subject to additive worst-case deterministic errors that are square summable. We study the trade-offs between the convergence rate and robustness to gradient errors when designing the parameters of a first-order algorithm. We focus on a general class of momentum methods (GMM) with constant step size and two momentum parameters that can recover gradient descent (GD), Nesterov’s accelerated gradient (NAG), the heavy-ball (HB) method, and the triple-momentum method as special cases. We measure the robustness of an algorithm in terms of the cumulative suboptimality in function values over the iterations normalized by the squared [Formula: see text] norm of the gradient errors. This quantity can be interpreted as the (squared) [Formula: see text] gain of a dynamical system that represents the GMM iterations where the input is the gradient error sequence and the output is a weighted distance to the optimum. For quadratic objectives, we compute the [Formula: see text] gain by explicitly leveraging its representation as the [Formula: see text] norm of the GMM system in the frequency domain and construct gradient errors that lead to worst-case performance explicitly. We also study the stability of GMM with respect to multiplicative errors by characterizing the structured real and stability radius of the GMM system through their connections to the [Formula: see text] norm. This allows us to compare GD, HB, and NAG methods in terms of robustness and argue that HB is not as robust as NAG, despite being the fastest in terms of the rate. We then develop the robustly stable HB method that can be faster than NAG while being at the best robustness level possible. We also propose the robustly stable GD that is the fastest version of GD with constant step size while being at the best robustness level. In addition, we extend our framework to general strongly convex smooth objectives, providing nonasymptotic rate results for inexact GMMs and bounds on the [Formula: see text] gain where we can choose the GMM parameters to systematically trade off the rate to robustness in a computationally tractable framework. Finally, we discuss how our results can be extended to more general noise that can be stochastic. Funding: This work was funded in part by the Office of Naval Research [Grants N00014-21-1-2244 and N00014-24-12628] and the National Science Foundation [Grant DMS-2053485]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2023.0321 .

Mathematics of Operations Research
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.