Pain modality shapes empathy: Amplified empathic responses for visceral compared to somatic pain

Visceral pain, an evolutionarily prepared signal of interoceptive threat, is highly prevalent in clinical populations yet remains underexplored in empathy research. While empathy for pain is central to social behavior, little is known about how different pain modalities, particularly visceral versus somatic pain, shape empathic responses. In this experimental study involving healthy adults, validated multiple-threat pain conditioning was combined with a novel, ecologically valid paradigm incorporating first-hand pain experience, perspective-taking (self, loved one, stranger), and memory assessments. Participants performed a trait empathy task (study day 1), received intensity-matched visceral and somatic stimuli (study day 2), accomplished an imagination-based empathy task (study day 3) and a delayed empathic recall session (study day 4). Visceral pain consistently elicited higher ratings of intensity, unpleasantness, empathic concern, and personal distress than somatic pain, during both direct experience and imagination. This effect was strongest when adopting the loved one's perspective and persisted in the absence of noxious stimulation. Empathic responses for the loved one exceeded those for both the self and the stranger, suggesting that relational closeness amplifies affective and evaluative dimensions of empathy. Moreover, individual differences in trait emotional empathy selectively predicted empathic concern and personal distress for visceral pain in the loved one's perspective, indicating a modality- and relationship-specific pattern. These findings show that empathy for pain is shaped by both pain modality and social context. The heightened salience of visceral pain may differentially influence empathic engagement, with implications for understanding interpersonal dynamics and improving care in patients with chronic visceral pain. PERSPECTIVE: This study explores how visceral and somatic pain influence empathic responses, both during first-hand experience and when imagining pain, revealing that visceral pain elicits stronger empathy, particularly for loved ones. These findings highlight the interplay between pain modality and social factors in shaping empathy, offering insights for chronic pain care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pain
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105631
Primary Topic
Empathy and Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pain modality shapes empathy: Amplified empathic responses for visceral compared to somatic pain

Adriane Icenhour, Milena Pertz, Sigrid Elsenbruch, Robert Jan Pawlik et al.
Journal of Pain
Empathy and Medical Education
article

Pain modality shapes empathy: Amplified empathic responses for visceral compared to somatic pain

Adriane Icenhour, Milena Pertz, Sigrid Elsenbruch, Robert Jan Pawlik, Thomas Penack
article en

Abstract

Visceral pain, an evolutionarily prepared signal of interoceptive threat, is highly prevalent in clinical populations yet remains underexplored in empathy research. While empathy for pain is central to social behavior, little is known about how different pain modalities, particularly visceral versus somatic pain, shape empathic responses. In this experimental study involving healthy adults, validated multiple-threat pain conditioning was combined with a novel, ecologically valid paradigm incorporating first-hand pain experience, perspective-taking (self, loved one, stranger), and memory assessments. Participants performed a trait empathy task (study day 1), received intensity-matched visceral and somatic stimuli (study day 2), accomplished an imagination-based empathy task (study day 3) and a delayed empathic recall session (study day 4). Visceral pain consistently elicited higher ratings of intensity, unpleasantness, empathic concern, and personal distress than somatic pain, during both direct experience and imagination. This effect was strongest when adopting the loved one's perspective and persisted in the absence of noxious stimulation. Empathic responses for the loved one exceeded those for both the self and the stranger, suggesting that relational closeness amplifies affective and evaluative dimensions of empathy. Moreover, individual differences in trait emotional empathy selectively predicted empathic concern and personal distress for visceral pain in the loved one's perspective, indicating a modality- and relationship-specific pattern. These findings show that empathy for pain is shaped by both pain modality and social context. The heightened salience of visceral pain may differentially influence empathic engagement, with implications for understanding interpersonal dynamics and improving care in patients with chronic visceral pain. PERSPECTIVE: This study explores how visceral and somatic pain influence empathic responses, both during first-hand experience and when imagining pain, revealing that visceral pain elicits stronger empathy, particularly for loved ones. These findings highlight the interplay between pain modality and social factors in shaping empathy, offering insights for chronic pain care.

Journal of PainVol. 39
University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum (DE), Essen University Hospital (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Empathy and Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.