The Effect of Adjunctive Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Peri-Implant Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Peri-implant diseases may occur around osseointegrated implants and lead to implant loss. Treatment strategies focus on infection control with decontamination of implant surfaces/pockets. Mechanical debridement (MD) is necessary to reduce biofilm, although it may have limited effects. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) has been proposed to increase the potential of MD. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate aPDT in adjunct to MD versus MD as a single treatment. <b>Methods</b>: An electronic and hand literature search was performed in several databases up to March 2025 to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed by Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs (RoB 2). A meta-analysis was performed with marginal bone level change (MBLc) as the primary outcome, and changes in probing depth (PD) and bleeding on probing (BOP) as secondary outcomes. <b>Results</b>: Eleven RCTs (1056 implants, 878 patients) were included. RoB was high: in 3 studies; some concerns: in 4 studies; low: in 4 studies. The included studies showed a high heterogeneity for MD/aPDT protocols and diagnostic criteria of peri-implant diseases. The meta-analysis revealed, for four studies, a significantly higher MBLc for test patients (M∆: 0.29, 95% CI 0.12, 0.46; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a significantly higher BOP change (M∆ 5.59; 95% CI: 1.19, 9.86; <i>p</i> = 0.01). No significant difference was found at 6 months in terms of PD change between the test and control groups (M∆ 0.46; 95% CI -0.09, 1.02; <i>p</i> = 0.10). High heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> > 85%) for all three outcomes was found. <b>Conclusions</b>: High heterogeneity, diagnostic variability, and the low number of included studies increase the need of well-designed RCTs on the topic. Despite no conclusive evidence could be found, adjunctive aPDT showed a promising trend to improve MD results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13120567
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Adjunctive Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Peri-Implant Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Marco Annunziata, Livia Nastri, Michele Giuseppe Pio Di Mare, Luigi Guida et al.
Dentistry Journal
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

The Effect of Adjunctive Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Peri-Implant Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Marco Annunziata, Livia Nastri, Michele Giuseppe Pio Di Mare, Luigi Guida, Agostino Guida, Pierluigi Mariani
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Peri-implant diseases may occur around osseointegrated implants and lead to implant loss. Treatment strategies focus on infection control with decontamination of implant surfaces/pockets. Mechanical debridement (MD) is necessary to reduce biofilm, although it may have limited effects. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) has been proposed to increase the potential of MD. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate aPDT in adjunct to MD versus MD as a single treatment. <b>Methods</b>: An electronic and hand literature search was performed in several databases up to March 2025 to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed by Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs (RoB 2). A meta-analysis was performed with marginal bone level change (MBLc) as the primary outcome, and changes in probing depth (PD) and bleeding on probing (BOP) as secondary outcomes. <b>Results</b>: Eleven RCTs (1056 implants, 878 patients) were included. RoB was high: in 3 studies; some concerns: in 4 studies; low: in 4 studies. The included studies showed a high heterogeneity for MD/aPDT protocols and diagnostic criteria of peri-implant diseases. The meta-analysis revealed, for four studies, a significantly higher MBLc for test patients (M∆: 0.29, 95% CI 0.12, 0.46; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and a significantly higher BOP change (M∆ 5.59; 95% CI: 1.19, 9.86; <i>p</i> = 0.01). No significant difference was found at 6 months in terms of PD change between the test and control groups (M∆ 0.46; 95% CI -0.09, 1.02; <i>p</i> = 0.10). High heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> > 85%) for all three outcomes was found. <b>Conclusions</b>: High heterogeneity, diagnostic variability, and the low number of included studies increase the need of well-designed RCTs on the topic. Despite no conclusive evidence could be found, adjunctive aPDT showed a promising trend to improve MD results.

Dentistry JournalVol. 13(12)
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT), Ospedale Antonio Cardarelli (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.