Heritage and Environment: Archaeology at a United Fruit Company Site, 1909–1939

The process of creating archaeological heritage sites is necessarily rooted in the environments that surround them. This was particularly true for the Maya archaeological site of Quiriguá, located within a United Fruit Company banana plantation. Foreign archaeologists working at Quiriguá actively managed the surrounding landscape, shaping it for excavation work or, increasingly, to conform to a tourist aesthetic. Guatemalan scholars, tourists, and politicians by contrast displayed distinct interpretations of the tropical environment. Archaeological debates directed attention to environmental changes in the region and led Guatemalan elites to question the expansion of banana plantations at the expense of tropical forests, drawing together nascent efforts to conserve both ruins and specific aspects of the natural world. In this, they challenged a previously dominant notion of Guatemala’s tropical lowlands as empty “wastelands” but also solidified narratives about archaeology as national heritage that excluded the contemporary Indigenous population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental History
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/738449
Primary Topic
Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heritage and Environment: Archaeology at a United Fruit Company Site, 1909–1939

Sophie Brockmann
Environmental History
Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
article

Heritage and Environment: Archaeology at a United Fruit Company Site, 1909–1939

Sophie Brockmann
article en

Abstract

The process of creating archaeological heritage sites is necessarily rooted in the environments that surround them. This was particularly true for the Maya archaeological site of Quiriguá, located within a United Fruit Company banana plantation. Foreign archaeologists working at Quiriguá actively managed the surrounding landscape, shaping it for excavation work or, increasingly, to conform to a tourist aesthetic. Guatemalan scholars, tourists, and politicians by contrast displayed distinct interpretations of the tropical environment. Archaeological debates directed attention to environmental changes in the region and led Guatemalan elites to question the expansion of banana plantations at the expense of tropical forests, drawing together nascent efforts to conserve both ruins and specific aspects of the natural world. In this, they challenged a previously dominant notion of Guatemala’s tropical lowlands as empty “wastelands” but also solidified narratives about archaeology as national heritage that excluded the contemporary Indigenous population.

Environmental HistoryVol. 31(1)
University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.