Simultaneous prediction of early and delayed mortality in burn patients: a comparative machine learning analysis of feature importance in a single-center retrospective study

Simultaneous prediction of early (≤120 hours) and delayed ( > 120 hours) mortality in burn patients is essential for timely interventions and effective resource allocation. Early mortality often reflects the immediate shock period following severe burn, whereas delayed mortality is commonly associated with secondary complications. This dual prediction is clinically important because it enables tailored intervention timing facilitating rapid stabilization strategies for patients at risk of early death while guiding long-term monitoring and complication management for those at risk of delayed mortality. We retrospectively analyzed 1094 burn patients from a single center, incorporating demographic, clinical, and treatment-related variables. A multi-output classification framework was developed using Random Forest, Extra Trees, and CatBoost, with preprocessing, feature selection, and normalization. Model performance was evaluated on the independent hold-out test set using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1 score, log-loss, AUC, specificity, and negative predictive value. On the hold-out test set, Extra Trees yielded the highest accuracy (0.806) and F1 score (0.805), while CatBoost demonstrated higher probability calibration (lowest Log-Loss = 0.453) and Random Forest maintained the highest discrimination capacity (AUC = 0.882). Feature importance analysis consistently identified Total Burn Surface Area (TBSA), Weight, Debridement, Escharotomy, Age, and Perineogenital Area Burn as the most influential predictors across models. Collectively, these results indicate that three independently trained multi-output models can robustly stratify burn patients according to early (≤120 h) and delayed ( > 120 h) mortality risk, thereby enabling time-sensitive, personalized interventions and informed clinical resource allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03311-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simultaneous prediction of early and delayed mortality in burn patients: a comparative machine learning analysis of feature importance in a single-center retrospective study

M. Edward Motamedi, Mojtaba Ghorbani, Mohammadhossein Hesamirostami, Leila Shokrizadeharani et al.
1 citations
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
1.35
article

Simultaneous prediction of early and delayed mortality in burn patients: a comparative machine learning analysis of feature importance in a single-center retrospective study

M. Edward Motamedi, Mojtaba Ghorbani, Mohammadhossein Hesamirostami, Leila Shokrizadeharani, Najibeh Mohseni Moallemkolaei
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Simultaneous prediction of early (≤120 hours) and delayed ( > 120 hours) mortality in burn patients is essential for timely interventions and effective resource allocation. Early mortality often reflects the immediate shock period following severe burn, whereas delayed mortality is commonly associated with secondary complications. This dual prediction is clinically important because it enables tailored intervention timing facilitating rapid stabilization strategies for patients at risk of early death while guiding long-term monitoring and complication management for those at risk of delayed mortality. We retrospectively analyzed 1094 burn patients from a single center, incorporating demographic, clinical, and treatment-related variables. A multi-output classification framework was developed using Random Forest, Extra Trees, and CatBoost, with preprocessing, feature selection, and normalization. Model performance was evaluated on the independent hold-out test set using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1 score, log-loss, AUC, specificity, and negative predictive value. On the hold-out test set, Extra Trees yielded the highest accuracy (0.806) and F1 score (0.805), while CatBoost demonstrated higher probability calibration (lowest Log-Loss = 0.453) and Random Forest maintained the highest discrimination capacity (AUC = 0.882). Feature importance analysis consistently identified Total Burn Surface Area (TBSA), Weight, Debridement, Escharotomy, Age, and Perineogenital Area Burn as the most influential predictors across models. Collectively, these results indicate that three independently trained multi-output models can robustly stratify burn patients according to early (≤120 h) and delayed ( > 120 h) mortality risk, thereby enabling time-sensitive, personalized interventions and informed clinical resource allocation.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision MakingVol. 26(1)
Kashan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Health Information Management (BE), Babol Noshirvani University of Technology (IR), Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.