A Novel Dynamic Ampacity Assessment Method for Direct Burial Cables Based on an Electro-Thermal-Fluid Multiphysics Coupling Model

Traditional ampacity evaluation methods for direct burial cables, like the correction factor method and the IEC 60287 analytical method, suffer from large calculation errors when dealing with complex installation environments. This paper investigated the influence of multiple environmental factors and proximity effects on the ampacity of 35 kV YJLV22-26/35 3 × 400 mm2 direct burial cables using an electro-thermal-fluid coupling FEM model. The results indicate that when accounting for surface temperature and burial depth, the correction factor method may overestimate ampacity by up to 7%, while the analytical method may underestimate it by up to 24%. When soil thermal resistance variations are considered, the correction factor method could overestimate ampacity by 14%, whereas the analytical method may underestimate it by 10%. Due to neglecting solar radiation and air convection effects, these two methods can introduce calculation errors of 23% and 34%, respectively. The ampacity of multi-circuit parallel configurations increases with greater circuit spacing. Based on FEM simulation results, a new dynamic ampacity evaluation method has been proposed that comprehensively considers multiple environmental variables including ambient temperature, burial depth, soil thermal resistivity, solar radiation intensity, wind speed, the number of parallel circuits, and circuit spacing. This method can be directly applied to guide engineering design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236271
Primary Topic
Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Novel Dynamic Ampacity Assessment Method for Direct Burial Cables Based on an Electro-Thermal-Fluid Multiphysics Coupling Model

Ziwei Ma, Wenlong Zhang
Energies
Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission
article

A Novel Dynamic Ampacity Assessment Method for Direct Burial Cables Based on an Electro-Thermal-Fluid Multiphysics Coupling Model

Ziwei Ma, Wenlong Zhang
article en

Abstract

Traditional ampacity evaluation methods for direct burial cables, like the correction factor method and the IEC 60287 analytical method, suffer from large calculation errors when dealing with complex installation environments. This paper investigated the influence of multiple environmental factors and proximity effects on the ampacity of 35 kV YJLV22-26/35 3 × 400 mm2 direct burial cables using an electro-thermal-fluid coupling FEM model. The results indicate that when accounting for surface temperature and burial depth, the correction factor method may overestimate ampacity by up to 7%, while the analytical method may underestimate it by up to 24%. When soil thermal resistance variations are considered, the correction factor method could overestimate ampacity by 14%, whereas the analytical method may underestimate it by 10%. Due to neglecting solar radiation and air convection effects, these two methods can introduce calculation errors of 23% and 34%, respectively. The ampacity of multi-circuit parallel configurations increases with greater circuit spacing. Based on FEM simulation results, a new dynamic ampacity evaluation method has been proposed that comprehensively considers multiple environmental variables including ambient temperature, burial depth, soil thermal resistivity, solar radiation intensity, wind speed, the number of parallel circuits, and circuit spacing. This method can be directly applied to guide engineering design.

EnergiesVol. 18(23)
Yunnan Agricultural University (CN), Powerchina Huadong Engineering Corporation (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.