Buffering the Sting of Sexual Rejection to Promote Relationship Connection

Experiencing rejection from a romantic partner can be painful, and sexual rejection may have a lasting impact on satisfaction. However, some ways of communicating sexual rejection may elicit more constructive responses from the rejected partner, fostering continued connection in the face of rejection. Across three studies-a cross-sectional study of individuals in romantic relationships (Study 1; <i>N</i> = 315) and two dyadic daily diary studies (Studies 2-3; total <i>N</i> = 219 couples contributing 9,287 daily reports)-we tested whether specific ways of communicating sexual rejection are associated with the rejected partner's emotional and behavioral responses. Across studies, perceived hostile rejection (e.g. the partner displayed criticism) was associated with more negative responses (i.e. resentment) from the rejected partner. In contrast, perceived reassuring rejection (e.g. the partner expressed warmth or future interest in sex) elicited more positive responses to rejection (i.e. understanding) and maintained the rejected partner's sexual desire. The findings extend relationship theories to understand sexual conflict, and provide a framework of specific, observable behaviors that researchers and clinicians can incorporate to help couples navigate the challenges of sexual rejection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Sex Research
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2025.2590034
Primary Topic
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Buffering the Sting of Sexual Rejection to Promote Relationship Connection

Kiersten Dobson, Amy Muise, Cheryl Harasymchuk, Emily A. Impett et al.
The Journal of Sex Research
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
article

Buffering the Sting of Sexual Rejection to Promote Relationship Connection

Kiersten Dobson, Amy Muise, Cheryl Harasymchuk, Emily A. Impett, James J. Kim
article en

Abstract

Experiencing rejection from a romantic partner can be painful, and sexual rejection may have a lasting impact on satisfaction. However, some ways of communicating sexual rejection may elicit more constructive responses from the rejected partner, fostering continued connection in the face of rejection. Across three studies-a cross-sectional study of individuals in romantic relationships (Study 1; <i>N</i> = 315) and two dyadic daily diary studies (Studies 2-3; total <i>N</i> = 219 couples contributing 9,287 daily reports)-we tested whether specific ways of communicating sexual rejection are associated with the rejected partner's emotional and behavioral responses. Across studies, perceived hostile rejection (e.g. the partner displayed criticism) was associated with more negative responses (i.e. resentment) from the rejected partner. In contrast, perceived reassuring rejection (e.g. the partner expressed warmth or future interest in sex) elicited more positive responses to rejection (i.e. understanding) and maintained the rejected partner's sexual desire. The findings extend relationship theories to understand sexual conflict, and provide a framework of specific, observable behaviors that researchers and clinicians can incorporate to help couples navigate the challenges of sexual rejection.

The Journal of Sex Research
University of Toronto (CA), York University (CA), Carleton University (CA), Lakehead University (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Buffering the Sting of Sexual Rejection to Promote Relationship Connection — Kiersten Dobson, Amy Muise, et al. · The Journal of Sex Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS