Reassessing design priorities: Critical success factors (CSFs) and the disconnect between building design assumptions and project delivery

• Proposes a novel framework for CSFs and systematically ranks them using the design stages of the RIBA 2020 Plan of Work. • Results identify compliance and stakeholder engagement as more decisive than traditional design priorities in shaping project delivery. • Results reveal underrepresentation of Strategic Engineering & Design within AEC practice. • Provides actionable guidance for aligning building design with delivery outcomes in complex, large-scale building projects. The design stage is often celebrated as the central stage of architectural creativity yet remains weakly integrated into project-delivery frameworks. This study addresses this enduring gap by advancing the first systematic prioritization of design-stage Critical Success Factors (CSFs) within the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) Plan of Work 2020. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), expert judgements from 26 architects, engineers, and project managers in Dubai’s high-growth construction sector evaluated eight CSF categories and thirty-two sub-factors. Findings reveal that regulatory-compliance and stakeholder-engagement factors dominate, surpassing traditional design-centric priorities such as strategic engineering and creative authorship. This outcome reflects a reorientation relative to disciplinary expectations, with experts placing greater weight on coordination and procedural performance than on artistic or design-intent considerations. The study introduces a novel RIBA-based CSF framework that empirically links design intent with delivery outcomes and redefines the interface between design management and project performance. The results contribute theoretically by conceptualizing design–delivery integration and misalignments as a quantifiable hierarchy of success factors, and practically by offering actionable benchmarks for regulators, consultants, and design leaders seeking to rebalance creativity and compliance in performance-driven construction environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108573
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reassessing design priorities: Critical success factors (CSFs) and the disconnect between building design assumptions and project delivery

Moohammed Wasim Yahia, Emad S. N. Mushtaha, Ahmad W. Sukkar, Mamun Rashid et al.
Results in Engineering
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Reassessing design priorities: Critical success factors (CSFs) and the disconnect between building design assumptions and project delivery

Moohammed Wasim Yahia, Emad S. N. Mushtaha, Ahmad W. Sukkar, Mamun Rashid, Salem Buhashima Abdalla, Lama Maher Husein
article en

Abstract

• Proposes a novel framework for CSFs and systematically ranks them using the design stages of the RIBA 2020 Plan of Work. • Results identify compliance and stakeholder engagement as more decisive than traditional design priorities in shaping project delivery. • Results reveal underrepresentation of Strategic Engineering & Design within AEC practice. • Provides actionable guidance for aligning building design with delivery outcomes in complex, large-scale building projects. The design stage is often celebrated as the central stage of architectural creativity yet remains weakly integrated into project-delivery frameworks. This study addresses this enduring gap by advancing the first systematic prioritization of design-stage Critical Success Factors (CSFs) within the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) Plan of Work 2020. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), expert judgements from 26 architects, engineers, and project managers in Dubai’s high-growth construction sector evaluated eight CSF categories and thirty-two sub-factors. Findings reveal that regulatory-compliance and stakeholder-engagement factors dominate, surpassing traditional design-centric priorities such as strategic engineering and creative authorship. This outcome reflects a reorientation relative to disciplinary expectations, with experts placing greater weight on coordination and procedural performance than on artistic or design-intent considerations. The study introduces a novel RIBA-based CSF framework that empirically links design intent with delivery outcomes and redefines the interface between design management and project performance. The results contribute theoretically by conceptualizing design–delivery integration and misalignments as a quantifiable hierarchy of success factors, and practically by offering actionable benchmarks for regulators, consultants, and design leaders seeking to rebalance creativity and compliance in performance-driven construction environments.

Results in EngineeringVol. 29
University of Sharjah (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.