Pharmacoepigenomics in Personalized Medicine: A Hypothesis-Generating Approach to Introduce CpG-PGx SNPs as New Candidates for a Systematic Insight into Genomic-Epigenomic-Phenomic-Pharmacogenomics (G-E-Ph-PGx) Axis

<b>Background</b>: There are important gaps in describing the associations between variants found by GWAS and various phenotypes. Prior reports suggest that SNPs in regulatory regions should be further investigated to uncover these associations. Thus, this study involved a novel approach, along with Pharmacoepigenomics, prompting a new coined term "CpG-PGx SNP". <b>Methods</b>: The rationale behind our analysis strategy was based on the impact of SNPs playing dual roles both in the CpG site disruption/formation and having PGx associations. Thus, we employed GeneCards (relevance score), PharmGKB (significant <i>p</i>-value), and GWAS catalog data for each gene (<i>p</i> < 5 × 10<sup>-8</sup>). Following the obtainment of the 25 best-scored genes of four major epigenetic processes (methylation, demethylation, acetylation, and deacetylation), we generated two lists of candidate genes, including potential CpG-PGx SNPs and possible CpG-PGx SNPs. Results: Among 2900 significant PGx annotations, we found 99 potential CpG-PGx SNPs related to 16 genes. <i>CYP2B6</i>, <i>CYP2C19</i>, <i>CYP2D6</i>, and <i>COMT</i> genes were the top genes. Additionally, we found 1230 significant GWAS-based SNPs, among them 329 CpG-SNPs related to 48 genes with at least one CpG site disruption/formation. The top gene with the highest CpG-SNPs was <i>TET2</i>, followed by <i>JMJD1C</i> and <i>HDAC9</i>. Importantly, we detected some synonymous variants in the Epigenetically Modifiable Accessible Region (EMAR), which can provide insights into undiscovered roles of these SNPs. We identified 173 CpG-Disruptive SNPs, 155 CpG-Forming SNPs, and just 1 CpG SNP with both impacts. <b>Conclusions</b>: In conclusion, here we introduce CpG-PGx SNP for the first time and suggest three major genes playing crucial roles in Pharmacoepigenomics (PEpGx), <i>CYP2D6</i> as the heart of PEpGx, and <i>TET2</i> with the highest possibility of having CPG-PGx SNPs. We believe that this approach will help the scientific community to utilize "CpG-PGx SNP" to unravel complex disease-driven genetic and epigenetic interactions, yielding therapeutic opportunities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15120579
Primary Topic
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmacoepigenomics in Personalized Medicine: A Hypothesis-Generating Approach to Introduce CpG-PGx SNPs as New Candidates for a Systematic Insight into Genomic-Epigenomic-Phenomic-Pharmacogenomics (G-E-Ph-PGx) Axis

Rossano Kepler Alvim Fiorelli, Eliot L. Gardner, Kenneth Blum, Alireza Sharafshah et al.
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
article

Pharmacoepigenomics in Personalized Medicine: A Hypothesis-Generating Approach to Introduce CpG-PGx SNPs as New Candidates for a Systematic Insight into Genomic-Epigenomic-Phenomic-Pharmacogenomics (G-E-Ph-PGx) Axis

Rossano Kepler Alvim Fiorelli, Eliot L. Gardner, Kenneth Blum, Alireza Sharafshah, David Baron, Igor Elman, Albert Pinhasov, Kai‐Uwe Lewandrowski, Brian Fuehrlein, Sergio L. Schmidt, Mark S. Gold, Panayotis K. Thanos, Alexander P. L. Lewandrowski, Morgan P. Lorio
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: There are important gaps in describing the associations between variants found by GWAS and various phenotypes. Prior reports suggest that SNPs in regulatory regions should be further investigated to uncover these associations. Thus, this study involved a novel approach, along with Pharmacoepigenomics, prompting a new coined term "CpG-PGx SNP". <b>Methods</b>: The rationale behind our analysis strategy was based on the impact of SNPs playing dual roles both in the CpG site disruption/formation and having PGx associations. Thus, we employed GeneCards (relevance score), PharmGKB (significant <i>p</i>-value), and GWAS catalog data for each gene (<i>p</i> < 5 × 10<sup>-8</sup>). Following the obtainment of the 25 best-scored genes of four major epigenetic processes (methylation, demethylation, acetylation, and deacetylation), we generated two lists of candidate genes, including potential CpG-PGx SNPs and possible CpG-PGx SNPs. Results: Among 2900 significant PGx annotations, we found 99 potential CpG-PGx SNPs related to 16 genes. <i>CYP2B6</i>, <i>CYP2C19</i>, <i>CYP2D6</i>, and <i>COMT</i> genes were the top genes. Additionally, we found 1230 significant GWAS-based SNPs, among them 329 CpG-SNPs related to 48 genes with at least one CpG site disruption/formation. The top gene with the highest CpG-SNPs was <i>TET2</i>, followed by <i>JMJD1C</i> and <i>HDAC9</i>. Importantly, we detected some synonymous variants in the Epigenetically Modifiable Accessible Region (EMAR), which can provide insights into undiscovered roles of these SNPs. We identified 173 CpG-Disruptive SNPs, 155 CpG-Forming SNPs, and just 1 CpG SNP with both impacts. <b>Conclusions</b>: In conclusion, here we introduce CpG-PGx SNP for the first time and suggest three major genes playing crucial roles in Pharmacoepigenomics (PEpGx), <i>CYP2D6</i> as the heart of PEpGx, and <i>TET2</i> with the highest possibility of having CPG-PGx SNPs. We believe that this approach will help the scientific community to utilize "CpG-PGx SNP" to unravel complex disease-driven genetic and epigenetic interactions, yielding therapeutic opportunities.

Journal of Personalized MedicineVol. 15(12)
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), Cambridge Health Alliance (US), National Institute on Drug Abuse (US), Harvard University (US), University of Arizona (US), Guilan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University High School (US), Yale University (US), Desert Institute For Spine Care (US), NeuroGenetic Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US), Jacobs Institute (US), Ariel University (IL), Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Western University of Health Sciences (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.