In vitro assessment of shear force buffering in sacral dressings to alleviate pressure injuries in bed-based patients

Although significant differences were identified between dressing types, DCoF was not indicative of dressing performance. Dressing compression, rather than thickness, was indicative of peak shear buffering. All dressings reduced the shear observed at the skin with respect to the control. The reduction in shear ratio between the control and all dressings tested was significant, ranging from 0.528-0.567 at 6kPa and 0.510-0.560 at 8kPa. Prophylactic use of these types of dressings to reduce risk of PI (widely specified within hospital and care setting protocols) confirms that this benefit is seen in the clinical setting. However, while there was a significant difference between the three dressing types (p=0.039 at 6kPa and p=0.050 at 8kPa), further work is required to explore how this translates to a clinical setting. Shear buffering is a complex process and performance is dependent on the compound response of the constituent dressing elements, rather than being dominated by a single component.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wound Care
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2022.0242
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In vitro assessment of shear force buffering in sacral dressings to alleviate pressure injuries in bed-based patients

Peter Culmer, Rory Peter Turnbull, Ali Alazmani, D. M. Jones
Journal of Wound Care
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
article

In vitro assessment of shear force buffering in sacral dressings to alleviate pressure injuries in bed-based patients

Peter Culmer, Rory Peter Turnbull, Ali Alazmani, D. M. Jones
article en

Abstract

Although significant differences were identified between dressing types, DCoF was not indicative of dressing performance. Dressing compression, rather than thickness, was indicative of peak shear buffering. All dressings reduced the shear observed at the skin with respect to the control. The reduction in shear ratio between the control and all dressings tested was significant, ranging from 0.528-0.567 at 6kPa and 0.510-0.560 at 8kPa. Prophylactic use of these types of dressings to reduce risk of PI (widely specified within hospital and care setting protocols) confirms that this benefit is seen in the clinical setting. However, while there was a significant difference between the three dressing types (p=0.039 at 6kPa and p=0.050 at 8kPa), further work is required to explore how this translates to a clinical setting. Shear buffering is a complex process and performance is dependent on the compound response of the constituent dressing elements, rather than being dominated by a single component.

Journal of Wound CareVol. 34(12)
University of Leeds (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

In vitro assessment of shear force buffering in sacral dressings to alleviate pressure injuries in bed-based patients — Peter Culmer, Rory Peter Turnbull, et al. · Journal of Wound Care (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS