Food is medicine: opportunities and challenges

The Food is Medicine (FIM) approach has emerged as a promising strategy to address the dual public health challenges of food insecurity and diet-related chronic diseases. Rooted in the concept of using nutrition as a therapeutic intervention, FIM programs such as medically tailored meals (MTMs), medically tailored groceries (MTGs), and produce prescriptions (PRx) aim to integrate food-based support into clinical care. Findings suggest that MTMs are associated with improvements in diet quality, glycemic control, and reductions in hospitalizations and healthcare costs, particularly among patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Produce prescription programs have shown potential in increasing fruit and vegetable consumption, reducing food insecurity, and improving metabolic health indicators, though results vary across populations and program designs. Early research in oncology populations also indicates that FIM interventions may enhance nutritional status and treatment tolerance. Despite these encouraging outcomes, the evidence base remains limited by small sample sizes, short intervention durations, and inconsistent evaluation metrics. Challenges to widespread implementation include limited access to FIM services among underserved populations, reliance on temporary funding sources, and insufficient integration of nutrition education. Additionally, most current programs target a relatively small segment of the population affected by poor diet quality. Broader policy and public health strategies may be needed to complement FIM efforts and address the root causes of nutrition-related disparities. In conclusion, FIM programs represent a valuable addition to the healthcare landscape, with demonstrated benefits in select populations. To maximize their impact, future research should focus on evaluating long-term outcomes, expanding reach to marginalized groups, and assessing cost-effectiveness. A coordinated effort that combines food assistance with nutrition education and policy-level interventions may offer a scalable solution to improve population health and reduce the burden of chronic disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Precision Nutrition
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/pn9.0000000000000121
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Food is medicine: opportunities and challenges

Lei Hao, Junxiu Liu, Kena Magar
Precision Nutrition
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Food is medicine: opportunities and challenges

Lei Hao, Junxiu Liu, Kena Magar
article en

Abstract

The Food is Medicine (FIM) approach has emerged as a promising strategy to address the dual public health challenges of food insecurity and diet-related chronic diseases. Rooted in the concept of using nutrition as a therapeutic intervention, FIM programs such as medically tailored meals (MTMs), medically tailored groceries (MTGs), and produce prescriptions (PRx) aim to integrate food-based support into clinical care. Findings suggest that MTMs are associated with improvements in diet quality, glycemic control, and reductions in hospitalizations and healthcare costs, particularly among patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Produce prescription programs have shown potential in increasing fruit and vegetable consumption, reducing food insecurity, and improving metabolic health indicators, though results vary across populations and program designs. Early research in oncology populations also indicates that FIM interventions may enhance nutritional status and treatment tolerance. Despite these encouraging outcomes, the evidence base remains limited by small sample sizes, short intervention durations, and inconsistent evaluation metrics. Challenges to widespread implementation include limited access to FIM services among underserved populations, reliance on temporary funding sources, and insufficient integration of nutrition education. Additionally, most current programs target a relatively small segment of the population affected by poor diet quality. Broader policy and public health strategies may be needed to complement FIM efforts and address the root causes of nutrition-related disparities. In conclusion, FIM programs represent a valuable addition to the healthcare landscape, with demonstrated benefits in select populations. To maximize their impact, future research should focus on evaluating long-term outcomes, expanding reach to marginalized groups, and assessing cost-effectiveness. A coordinated effort that combines food assistance with nutrition education and policy-level interventions may offer a scalable solution to improve population health and reduce the burden of chronic disease.

Precision NutritionVol. 4(4)
Indiana University of Pennsylvania (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.