A 10-Year Follow-Up Study on the Success Rate of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation and Implant Placement in Relation to Strontium Ranelate

<b>Background:</b> Maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) is frequently required for implant placement in the atrophic posterior maxilla. However, limited bone quality and volume can compromise long-term success. Strontium ranelate (SrR), a dual-acting bone agent, stimulates osteoblasts while inhibiting osteoclasts, potentially improving bone density and osseointegration in grafted sites. <b>Objective:</b> This 10-year preliminary split-mouth study evaluated the long-term effects of SrR on bone density, volume, and implant success following MSFA. <b>Methods:</b> Six patients underwent bilateral MSFA using a lateral window approach. One side received systemic SrR (2 g/day for 6 months) after grafting, while the contralateral side served as a control. CBCT and DEXA analyses were performed to assess bone density and volume. Bone biopsies were examined histologically and by microindentation. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, depending on distribution, with significance at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results:</b> After 10 years, SrR-treated sites demonstrated a mean 22.9% increase in bone density versus 12.5% in untreated controls. Although both groups experienced minor reductions in bone volume (SrR: -13.3%; control: -12.8%), SrR samples exhibited greater mineralization, hardness, and lamellar bone maturity. <b>Conclusions:</b> SrR improved bone density and mechanical properties but not long-term volume preservation. Given the small sample size (<i>n</i> = 6) and absence of implant stability and patient-reported outcomes, these results should be interpreted with caution. Future large-scale clinical trials incorporating survival, ISQ, and quality-of-life data are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13120565
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A 10-Year Follow-Up Study on the Success Rate of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation and Implant Placement in Relation to Strontium Ranelate

Danisia Haba, Mihaela Maria Ghinea, Gabriel Melian, Eliza Drăgan
Dentistry Journal
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

A 10-Year Follow-Up Study on the Success Rate of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation and Implant Placement in Relation to Strontium Ranelate

Danisia Haba, Mihaela Maria Ghinea, Gabriel Melian, Eliza Drăgan
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) is frequently required for implant placement in the atrophic posterior maxilla. However, limited bone quality and volume can compromise long-term success. Strontium ranelate (SrR), a dual-acting bone agent, stimulates osteoblasts while inhibiting osteoclasts, potentially improving bone density and osseointegration in grafted sites. <b>Objective:</b> This 10-year preliminary split-mouth study evaluated the long-term effects of SrR on bone density, volume, and implant success following MSFA. <b>Methods:</b> Six patients underwent bilateral MSFA using a lateral window approach. One side received systemic SrR (2 g/day for 6 months) after grafting, while the contralateral side served as a control. CBCT and DEXA analyses were performed to assess bone density and volume. Bone biopsies were examined histologically and by microindentation. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, depending on distribution, with significance at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results:</b> After 10 years, SrR-treated sites demonstrated a mean 22.9% increase in bone density versus 12.5% in untreated controls. Although both groups experienced minor reductions in bone volume (SrR: -13.3%; control: -12.8%), SrR samples exhibited greater mineralization, hardness, and lamellar bone maturity. <b>Conclusions:</b> SrR improved bone density and mechanical properties but not long-term volume preservation. Given the small sample size (<i>n</i> = 6) and absence of implant stability and patient-reported outcomes, these results should be interpreted with caution. Future large-scale clinical trials incorporating survival, ISQ, and quality-of-life data are warranted.

Dentistry JournalVol. 13(12)
Highways England (GB), Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Apollonia University (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.