Bootstrapping the cross-validation estimate

Cross-validation is a widely used technique for evaluating the performance of prediction models, ranging from simple binary classification to complex precision medicine strategies. It helps correct for optimism bias in error estimates, which can be significant for models built using complex statistical learning algorithms. However, since the cross-validation estimate is a random value dependent on observed data, it is essential to accurately quantify the uncertainty associated with the estimate. This is especially important when comparing the performance of two models using cross-validation, as one must determine whether differences in estimated error are due to chance. Although various methods have been developed to make inferences on cross-validation estimates, they often have many limitations, such as requiring stringent model assumptions. This paper proposes a fast bootstrap method that quickly estimates the standard error of the cross-validation estimate and produces valid confidence intervals for a population parameter measuring average model performance. Our method overcomes the computational challenges inherent in bootstrapping a cross-validation estimate by estimating the variance component within a random-effects model. It is also as flexible as the cross-validation procedure itself. To showcase the effectiveness of our approach, we conducted comprehensive simulations and real-data analysis across two applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Annals of Applied Statistics
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1214/25-aoas2036
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bootstrapping the cross-validation estimate

Xinzhou Guo, Lü Tian, Vivek Charu, Bryan Cai et al.
1 citations
The Annals of Applied Statistics
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
2.63
article

Bootstrapping the cross-validation estimate

Xinzhou Guo, Lü Tian, Vivek Charu, Bryan Cai, Menglan Pang, Changyu Shen, Carl de Moor, Fabio Pellegrini, Yuanhui Luo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Cross-validation is a widely used technique for evaluating the performance of prediction models, ranging from simple binary classification to complex precision medicine strategies. It helps correct for optimism bias in error estimates, which can be significant for models built using complex statistical learning algorithms. However, since the cross-validation estimate is a random value dependent on observed data, it is essential to accurately quantify the uncertainty associated with the estimate. This is especially important when comparing the performance of two models using cross-validation, as one must determine whether differences in estimated error are due to chance. Although various methods have been developed to make inferences on cross-validation estimates, they often have many limitations, such as requiring stringent model assumptions. This paper proposes a fast bootstrap method that quickly estimates the standard error of the cross-validation estimate and produces valid confidence intervals for a population parameter measuring average model performance. Our method overcomes the computational challenges inherent in bootstrapping a cross-validation estimate by estimating the variance component within a random-effects model. It is also as flexible as the cross-validation procedure itself. To showcase the effectiveness of our approach, we conducted comprehensive simulations and real-data analysis across two applications.

The Annals of Applied StatisticsVol. 19(4)
Biogen (United States) (US), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.