Trajectories and turning points: Objects of intermediation for generalisation

We introduce generalisation as an intermediated trajectory to explain how system innovations, like alternative food systems, diffuse. While existing literature on diffusion and scaling focuses on human agency and steady progression, we propose a relational, object-oriented approach that highlights the role of situated intermediation punctuating/disrupting trajectories of generalisation. We identify four key objects of intermediation—knowledge, value(s), infrastructures, and rules—and demonstrate their role in reconfiguring actor networks and redirecting transformative trajectories. Through three empirical cases (natural wine, sustainable apiculture, and participatory research in France), we demonstrate how intermediation around these objects resolves challenges (interdependencies, uncertainties, complexities, controversies) and creates turning points that redirect transformative pathways. Our framework integrates the trajectory-turning point model to identify four conditions for transformative change: stability, resistance, identity transformation, and role commitment. Findings reveal that generalisation is dynamic and intermediated, whereby objects and actors collaboratively reconfigure networks, institutional contexts, and innovation objectives. The original contribution of this meso-level perspective lies in theorising generalisation as an intermediated trajectory, emphasising the material and relational work of objects alongside human agency. This reframing advances transition studies and innovation policy research by shifting focus from diffusion mechanisms to the situated, iterative processes that enable systems transformation. • Generalisation is understood as a process of moving from one situation of socio-technical configuration to another. • Values, rules and infrastructures are intermediaries of generalisation, along with knowledge. • Multiple, situated intermediations provide the conditions for turning points to emerge in transformative trajectories. • Micro-level situated intermediations can result in meso-level generalisation of system innovations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124469
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trajectories and turning points: Objects of intermediation for generalisation

Lasse Bundgaard, Évelyne Lhoste, Mireille Matt, Renée van Dis et al.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Trajectories and turning points: Objects of intermediation for generalisation

Lasse Bundgaard, Évelyne Lhoste, Mireille Matt, Renée van Dis, Allison Marie Loconto, Matthias Weber
article en

Abstract

We introduce generalisation as an intermediated trajectory to explain how system innovations, like alternative food systems, diffuse. While existing literature on diffusion and scaling focuses on human agency and steady progression, we propose a relational, object-oriented approach that highlights the role of situated intermediation punctuating/disrupting trajectories of generalisation. We identify four key objects of intermediation—knowledge, value(s), infrastructures, and rules—and demonstrate their role in reconfiguring actor networks and redirecting transformative trajectories. Through three empirical cases (natural wine, sustainable apiculture, and participatory research in France), we demonstrate how intermediation around these objects resolves challenges (interdependencies, uncertainties, complexities, controversies) and creates turning points that redirect transformative pathways. Our framework integrates the trajectory-turning point model to identify four conditions for transformative change: stability, resistance, identity transformation, and role commitment. Findings reveal that generalisation is dynamic and intermediated, whereby objects and actors collaboratively reconfigure networks, institutional contexts, and innovation objectives. The original contribution of this meso-level perspective lies in theorising generalisation as an intermediated trajectory, emphasising the material and relational work of objects alongside human agency. This reframing advances transition studies and innovation policy research by shifting focus from diffusion mechanisms to the situated, iterative processes that enable systems transformation. • Generalisation is understood as a process of moving from one situation of socio-technical configuration to another. • Values, rules and infrastructures are intermediaries of generalisation, along with knowledge. • Multiple, situated intermediations provide the conditions for turning points to emerge in transformative trajectories. • Micro-level situated intermediations can result in meso-level generalisation of system innovations.

Technological Forecasting and Social ChangeVol. 224
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.