Comparison of crosslinked and non-crosslinked collagenated xenografts for vertical bone augmentation in rabbit calvaria

Bovine or porcine xenografts, which are readily available and possess osteoconductivity, are widely used for bone augmentation in clinical practice. The addition of collagen to particulated bone graft material improves handling characteristics and helps maintain graft integrity. These collagenated bone, when collagen is appropriately cross-linked, provide enhanced osteogenic potential and structural stability. However, studies on the histological changes due to the use of collagenated bovine bone for vertical bone augmentation are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the osteoconductivity and volume stability of two collagenated xenografts-deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with crosslinked bovine collagen (DBBM-Cb; A-Oss Collagen) and non-crosslinked porcine collagen (DBBM-NCp; Bio-Oss Collagen)-using rabbit calvarial models of vertical augmentation and critical-sized defects. Surface morphology of the grafts was analyzed using field emission scanning electron microscopy. In vivo bone regeneration was assessed using micro-computed tomography and histological analyses at 3, 5, 6, and 12 weeks following bone grafting in calvarial vertical-augmentation and defect models. Both grafts showed porous and interconnected microarchitecture favorable for osteoconduction. In the augmentation model, DBBM-Cb demonstrated significantly higher bone volume fraction (bone volume/total volume of bone tissue) at 3 weeks and vertical height retention at both 3 and 5 weeks (P < 0.05). In the defect model, DBBM-Cb led to significantly greater defect closure at 12 weeks (P < 0.05). Histological analyses confirmed improved graft integration and bone maturation with DBBM-Cb. DBBM-Cb exhibited superior osteoconductivity, structural stability, and graft volume maintenance compared to DBBM-NCp. These properties support its potential as a more effective biomaterial for vertical bone augmentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30824-6
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of crosslinked and non-crosslinked collagenated xenografts for vertical bone augmentation in rabbit calvaria

Hee‐seung Han, Young‐Dan Cho, Semin Kim, Sungtae Kim et al.
Scientific Reports
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

Comparison of crosslinked and non-crosslinked collagenated xenografts for vertical bone augmentation in rabbit calvaria

Hee‐seung Han, Young‐Dan Cho, Semin Kim, Sungtae Kim, Narasaem Lee, Hyunkyung Kim
article en

Abstract

Bovine or porcine xenografts, which are readily available and possess osteoconductivity, are widely used for bone augmentation in clinical practice. The addition of collagen to particulated bone graft material improves handling characteristics and helps maintain graft integrity. These collagenated bone, when collagen is appropriately cross-linked, provide enhanced osteogenic potential and structural stability. However, studies on the histological changes due to the use of collagenated bovine bone for vertical bone augmentation are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the osteoconductivity and volume stability of two collagenated xenografts-deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) with crosslinked bovine collagen (DBBM-Cb; A-Oss Collagen) and non-crosslinked porcine collagen (DBBM-NCp; Bio-Oss Collagen)-using rabbit calvarial models of vertical augmentation and critical-sized defects. Surface morphology of the grafts was analyzed using field emission scanning electron microscopy. In vivo bone regeneration was assessed using micro-computed tomography and histological analyses at 3, 5, 6, and 12 weeks following bone grafting in calvarial vertical-augmentation and defect models. Both grafts showed porous and interconnected microarchitecture favorable for osteoconduction. In the augmentation model, DBBM-Cb demonstrated significantly higher bone volume fraction (bone volume/total volume of bone tissue) at 3 weeks and vertical height retention at both 3 and 5 weeks (P < 0.05). In the defect model, DBBM-Cb led to significantly greater defect closure at 12 weeks (P < 0.05). Histological analyses confirmed improved graft integration and bone maturation with DBBM-Cb. DBBM-Cb exhibited superior osteoconductivity, structural stability, and graft volume maintenance compared to DBBM-NCp. These properties support its potential as a more effective biomaterial for vertical bone augmentation.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Korea University (KR), Osstem Implant (South Korea) (KR), Seoul National University Dental Hospital (KR)
National Research Foundation, Seoul National University, Korea Health Industry Development Institute, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.