Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials of interventions to improve sleep in people with cognitive impairment

Abstract Background Although sleep disturbance is common among people with cognitive impairment, leading to negative outcomes, there is a paucity of evidence to inform management in this cohort. Existing clinical trials are marked by wide heterogeneity, both in the methods used to measure sleep and in the outcome measures reported, limiting data synthesis. A core outcome set (COS) would improve the coherence and reliability of data in future clinical trials. Methods A multi-stage mixed-methods approach was adopted in accordance with The Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: the COS-STAD recommendations. Results A systematic review identified 287 sleep outcome measures from previous clinical trials. Qualitative interviews revealed that people living with cognitive impairment and their caregivers are most concerned with improving overall sleep quality, reducing the time taken to fall asleep and night-time awakenings, and avoiding daytime sleepiness. Ultimately, a modified Delphi process, involving 41 experts in sleep and cognition from six different continents, selected nine outcome measures for the COS: total sleep time, sleep onset latency, wakefulness after sleep onset, number of night-time awakenings, sleep efficiency, and measures of subjective sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, cognition, and mood. The Delphi panel recommended that both subjective and objective measures be used to measure sleep outcomes over at least one week. Subjective sleep quality should be measured using a single Likert-type question. Acknowledging limitations, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale was recommended to measure daytime sleepiness, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment to monitor cognition and the Geriatric Depression Scale to assess mood. Conclusion This COS will support the conduct of future clinical trials of interventions to improve sleep in people with cognitive impairment by ensuring more reliable, comparable and coherent data. This will lead to a more robust evidence base to manage sleep disturbance and improve the care of people living with cognitive impairment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf318.039
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials of interventions to improve sleep in people with cognitive impairment

Rónán Ó’Caoimh, Patrick Crowley, Evelyn Flanagan
Age and Ageing
Delphi Technique in Research
article

Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials of interventions to improve sleep in people with cognitive impairment

Rónán Ó’Caoimh, Patrick Crowley, Evelyn Flanagan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Although sleep disturbance is common among people with cognitive impairment, leading to negative outcomes, there is a paucity of evidence to inform management in this cohort. Existing clinical trials are marked by wide heterogeneity, both in the methods used to measure sleep and in the outcome measures reported, limiting data synthesis. A core outcome set (COS) would improve the coherence and reliability of data in future clinical trials. Methods A multi-stage mixed-methods approach was adopted in accordance with The Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: the COS-STAD recommendations. Results A systematic review identified 287 sleep outcome measures from previous clinical trials. Qualitative interviews revealed that people living with cognitive impairment and their caregivers are most concerned with improving overall sleep quality, reducing the time taken to fall asleep and night-time awakenings, and avoiding daytime sleepiness. Ultimately, a modified Delphi process, involving 41 experts in sleep and cognition from six different continents, selected nine outcome measures for the COS: total sleep time, sleep onset latency, wakefulness after sleep onset, number of night-time awakenings, sleep efficiency, and measures of subjective sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, cognition, and mood. The Delphi panel recommended that both subjective and objective measures be used to measure sleep outcomes over at least one week. Subjective sleep quality should be measured using a single Likert-type question. Acknowledging limitations, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale was recommended to measure daytime sleepiness, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment to monitor cognition and the Geriatric Depression Scale to assess mood. Conclusion This COS will support the conduct of future clinical trials of interventions to improve sleep in people with cognitive impairment by ensuring more reliable, comparable and coherent data. This will lead to a more robust evidence base to manage sleep disturbance and improve the care of people living with cognitive impairment.

Age and AgeingVol. 54(Supplement_4)
Mercy University Hospital (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.