Examining Care of Patients with Pelvic Fragility Fractures (PFF) in a Model Three Centre: What Can We Do Better?

Abstract Background Pelvic fragility fractures (PFF) are an increasingly common cause of emergency presentations among older adults. Despite their rising incidence, the care of patients with non-hip fragility fractures often lacks the multidisciplinary input and structured pathways available for neck of femur fractures. Building on the success of the Irish Hip Fracture Database and orthogeriatric models of care, this study explores outcomes of patients with PFFs, without a standardized model of care. Methods Patients aged >65 years with conservatively managed pelvic fractures of the pubic ramus, acetabulum, or sacrum/sacral ala were identified via local HIPE data from January 2024 to March 2025 (n = 91). Patients were excluded if the fracture was because of high-impact trauma (e.g., road traffic collisions). A retrospective chart review was undertaken. Results A total of 62 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 83 years; the majority were female (n = 45). All injuries resulted from low impact falls consistent with insufficiency or fragility fractures. 77% of patients had two imaging modalities to confirm diagnosis (n = 48) and 80% presented from home (n = 50). A falls assessment was conducted in only 27 patients (43%). A bone health assessment was not undertaken for 40% of patients (n = 25) and 48% (n = 30) were not provided with any bone protection on discharge from the acute hospital setting. 19% (n = 12) of patients were transferred to off-site rehabilitation facilities. 8% (n = 5) patients died during admission. Conclusion Our findings highlight a gap in the structured care of patients with PFF. The absence of standardized falls and bone health assessments represents a missed opportunity to reduce future fracture risk and subsequent hospital admissions. This study bolsters the need for the development of a national care bundle for PFF, mirroring the Irish Hip Fracture Database structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf318.167
Primary Topic
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining Care of Patients with Pelvic Fragility Fractures (PFF) in a Model Three Centre: What Can We Do Better?

Patrick O’Donoghue, Sarah Cuddy, Marianne Foley, Marie O’Connor
Age and Ageing
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
article

Examining Care of Patients with Pelvic Fragility Fractures (PFF) in a Model Three Centre: What Can We Do Better?

Patrick O’Donoghue, Sarah Cuddy, Marianne Foley, Marie O’Connor
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Pelvic fragility fractures (PFF) are an increasingly common cause of emergency presentations among older adults. Despite their rising incidence, the care of patients with non-hip fragility fractures often lacks the multidisciplinary input and structured pathways available for neck of femur fractures. Building on the success of the Irish Hip Fracture Database and orthogeriatric models of care, this study explores outcomes of patients with PFFs, without a standardized model of care. Methods Patients aged >65 years with conservatively managed pelvic fractures of the pubic ramus, acetabulum, or sacrum/sacral ala were identified via local HIPE data from January 2024 to March 2025 (n = 91). Patients were excluded if the fracture was because of high-impact trauma (e.g., road traffic collisions). A retrospective chart review was undertaken. Results A total of 62 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 83 years; the majority were female (n = 45). All injuries resulted from low impact falls consistent with insufficiency or fragility fractures. 77% of patients had two imaging modalities to confirm diagnosis (n = 48) and 80% presented from home (n = 50). A falls assessment was conducted in only 27 patients (43%). A bone health assessment was not undertaken for 40% of patients (n = 25) and 48% (n = 30) were not provided with any bone protection on discharge from the acute hospital setting. 19% (n = 12) of patients were transferred to off-site rehabilitation facilities. 8% (n = 5) patients died during admission. Conclusion Our findings highlight a gap in the structured care of patients with PFF. The absence of standardized falls and bone health assessments represents a missed opportunity to reduce future fracture risk and subsequent hospital admissions. This study bolsters the need for the development of a national care bundle for PFF, mirroring the Irish Hip Fracture Database structure.

Age and AgeingVol. 54(Supplement_4)
Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.