Appropriate Testing and Management of Vitamin D Levels in General Internal Medicine Inpatients

Abstract Background Vitamin D level testing in hospitalized patients is common but inconsistently guided by evidence, risking unnecessary healthcare costs, over-treatment, or missed diagnoses. This study evaluated adherence to the Health Service Executive (HSE) Laboratory criteria for vitamin D testing1, assessed therapeutic responses to results, and identified predictors of vitamin D levels in general internal medicine (GIM) inpatients. Methods A retrospective review evaluated 408 GIM inpatients that were categorised into four groups based on HSE-defined testing appropriateness: 1) testing indicated and ordered, 2) indicated but not ordered, 3) not indicated but ordered, 4) not indicated and not ordered. Testing appropriateness was assessed against HSE Laboratory criteria1, and predictors of testing practices and vitamin D levels were analysed using logistic regression models in R statistical software (v4.1.2), adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity and hospital length of stay. Results Of 408 patients, 35% (n=143) deviated from guidelines: 22.3% (n=91) did not receive a test despite an indication, while 12.3% (n=50) underwent testing without indication. Patients undergoing unindicated testing were older and had longer hospital stays. Older age (OR 1.08 per year, 95% CI 1.04-1.13; p<0.001) was associated with testing after controlling for indication. Of 77 tested patients, 62.3% (n=48) had sufficient levels (>50 nmol/L), 16.9% (n=13) insufficient (30-49 nmol/L) and 20.8% (n=16) deficient (<30 nmol/L). Supplementation was omitted in 32/48 (66.7%) of patients with adequate levels who required maintenance therapy. Conclusion Deviations from HSE Laboratory criteria were frequently observed, with older patients over-tested and high-risk populations undertested. Integrating electronic decision-support tools into electronic patient records, education and standardised protocols are essential to aligning practices with HSE guidelines and improving patient outcomes. Pre-admission supplementation may mitigate deficiency, suggesting a role for proactive outpatient interventions. Reference 1. Health Service Executive (2024). Indications for Measurement of Vitamin D Levels [PDF]. Available at: https://www.hse.ie/eng/about/who/cspd/lsr/resources/indications-for-measurement-of-vitamin-d-levels.pdf [Accessed 10th Oct 2024]

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf318.079
Primary Topic
Vitamin D Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Appropriate Testing and Management of Vitamin D Levels in General Internal Medicine Inpatients

Sarah Hickey, Martina Kelly, Caoimhe Shiel, Ryan Fagan et al.
Age and Ageing
Vitamin D Research Studies
article

Appropriate Testing and Management of Vitamin D Levels in General Internal Medicine Inpatients

Sarah Hickey, Martina Kelly, Caoimhe Shiel, Ryan Fagan, Keneilwe Malomo, Ontefetse Ntlholang, Joseph Browne, Wendy Paine, Joseph Deegan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Vitamin D level testing in hospitalized patients is common but inconsistently guided by evidence, risking unnecessary healthcare costs, over-treatment, or missed diagnoses. This study evaluated adherence to the Health Service Executive (HSE) Laboratory criteria for vitamin D testing1, assessed therapeutic responses to results, and identified predictors of vitamin D levels in general internal medicine (GIM) inpatients. Methods A retrospective review evaluated 408 GIM inpatients that were categorised into four groups based on HSE-defined testing appropriateness: 1) testing indicated and ordered, 2) indicated but not ordered, 3) not indicated but ordered, 4) not indicated and not ordered. Testing appropriateness was assessed against HSE Laboratory criteria1, and predictors of testing practices and vitamin D levels were analysed using logistic regression models in R statistical software (v4.1.2), adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity and hospital length of stay. Results Of 408 patients, 35% (n=143) deviated from guidelines: 22.3% (n=91) did not receive a test despite an indication, while 12.3% (n=50) underwent testing without indication. Patients undergoing unindicated testing were older and had longer hospital stays. Older age (OR 1.08 per year, 95% CI 1.04-1.13; p<0.001) was associated with testing after controlling for indication. Of 77 tested patients, 62.3% (n=48) had sufficient levels (>50 nmol/L), 16.9% (n=13) insufficient (30-49 nmol/L) and 20.8% (n=16) deficient (<30 nmol/L). Supplementation was omitted in 32/48 (66.7%) of patients with adequate levels who required maintenance therapy. Conclusion Deviations from HSE Laboratory criteria were frequently observed, with older patients over-tested and high-risk populations undertested. Integrating electronic decision-support tools into electronic patient records, education and standardised protocols are essential to aligning practices with HSE guidelines and improving patient outcomes. Pre-admission supplementation may mitigate deficiency, suggesting a role for proactive outpatient interventions. Reference 1. Health Service Executive (2024). Indications for Measurement of Vitamin D Levels [PDF]. Available at: https://www.hse.ie/eng/about/who/cspd/lsr/resources/indications-for-measurement-of-vitamin-d-levels.pdf [Accessed 10th Oct 2024]

Age and AgeingVol. 54(Supplement_4)
Trinity College (CA), Trinity College Dublin (IE), St Mary's Hospital Centre (CA), Mater Misericordiae University Hospital (IE), St. James's Hospital (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Vitamin D Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.