Effectiveness of mindfulness meditation on the quality of life, pain intensity, mobility and physical function in adults with chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To evaluate recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on mindfulness meditation in clinical settings to assess effects on pain reduction, mobility, quality of life, and physical function in patients with chronic lower-back pain (CLBP). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a literature search was conducted using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) framework. Mindfulness meditation was compared to control or usual care. Data from RCTs published between January 2010 and January 2025 were extracted from Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Studies were selected following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines; risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2) tool. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan). Mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for outcomes such as pain intensity, physical function, and quality of life. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Forest plots summarized effect sizes, and funnel plots assessed publication bias. Of 204 identified citations, seven RCTs met eligibility criteria. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for pain outcomes was − 1.01 (95% CI: − 1.77 to − 0.25; p < 0.00001), while quality of life showed an SMD of − 0.57 (95% CI: 0.15 to 0.99; p < 0.001). These results suggest that mindfulness meditation techniques are associated with significant improvements in pain reduction and enhanced quality of life compared to standard treatment. In contrast, the pooled SMD for physical function between mindfulness meditation and conventional therapy was 0.03 (95% CI: − 0.98 to 1.04), indicating no strong evidence that mindfulness meditation improves physical function over standard interventions. Notably, there was substantial heterogeneity among studies (χ² = 369.89, df = 5, p < 0.001; I² = 98.76%), likely due to variations in study design, sample populations, and intervention protocols in the mobility domain. Mindfulness meditation is more effective than conventional treatments for reducing pain intensity and improving quality of life in CLBP, though it may not enhance physical function or mobility. Further studies should assess long-term outcomes and optimal delivery methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Psychology
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44202-025-00525-2
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of mindfulness meditation on the quality of life, pain intensity, mobility and physical function in adults with chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Payam Dibaj, Michael E. Sughrue, Sam Safavi‐Abbasi, Elisa Venezia
Discover Psychology
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
article

Effectiveness of mindfulness meditation on the quality of life, pain intensity, mobility and physical function in adults with chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Payam Dibaj, Michael E. Sughrue, Sam Safavi‐Abbasi, Elisa Venezia
article en

Abstract

To evaluate recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on mindfulness meditation in clinical settings to assess effects on pain reduction, mobility, quality of life, and physical function in patients with chronic lower-back pain (CLBP). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a literature search was conducted using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) framework. Mindfulness meditation was compared to control or usual care. Data from RCTs published between January 2010 and January 2025 were extracted from Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Studies were selected following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines; risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2) tool. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan). Mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for outcomes such as pain intensity, physical function, and quality of life. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Forest plots summarized effect sizes, and funnel plots assessed publication bias. Of 204 identified citations, seven RCTs met eligibility criteria. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for pain outcomes was − 1.01 (95% CI: − 1.77 to − 0.25; p < 0.00001), while quality of life showed an SMD of − 0.57 (95% CI: 0.15 to 0.99; p < 0.001). These results suggest that mindfulness meditation techniques are associated with significant improvements in pain reduction and enhanced quality of life compared to standard treatment. In contrast, the pooled SMD for physical function between mindfulness meditation and conventional therapy was 0.03 (95% CI: − 0.98 to 1.04), indicating no strong evidence that mindfulness meditation improves physical function over standard interventions. Notably, there was substantial heterogeneity among studies (χ² = 369.89, df = 5, p < 0.001; I² = 98.76%), likely due to variations in study design, sample populations, and intervention protocols in the mobility domain. Mindfulness meditation is more effective than conventional treatments for reducing pain intensity and improving quality of life in CLBP, though it may not enhance physical function or mobility. Further studies should assess long-term outcomes and optimal delivery methods.

Discover PsychologyVol. 5(1)
Creighton University (US), Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE), Phoenix Neurological Associates (US), Regional Medical Center (US), Neurological Surgery (US), The Neurological Institute (US), University of Göttingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.