The predictive potential of the placental chorioangioma diameter for adverse pregnancy outcomes: a single-centre retrospective study

Placental chorioangioma (PCA) is a rare placental tumour that may significantly compromise pregnancy outcomes. However, the optimal diameter cutoff value for predicting adverse outcomes remains controversial, warranting further investigation. This retrospective study enrolled 94 pregnant women diagnosed with PCA at Wenzhou Central Hospital between January 2013 and July 2025. Additionally, stratified random sampling was used to select 159 pregnant women without a placental tumour during the same period as the non-PCA group. The basic information and pregnancy outcomes of the two groups were compared. Groups with adverse pregnancy outcomes (n = 57) and those without adverse pregnancy outcomes (n = 37) were further defined. The risk variables for adverse pregnancy outcomes in PCA patients were investigated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The therapeutic utility of the PCA diameter in evaluating adverse pregnancy outcomes in PCA patients was examined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. After stratifying the diameter, the incidence rates of adverse outcomes in different diameter intervals were statistically analysed. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the PCA diameter was a significant, though modest, independent risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes (OR = 1.026, 95% CI: 1.003–1.051, P = 0.027), implying a 2.6% increase in risk per 1-mm increase in diameter. ROC analysis demonstrated that a PCA diameter cutoff of 4.7 cm predicted adverse outcomes (82.1% sensitivity, 50.0% specificity), with an AUC of 0.705 (95% CI: 0.600-0.811, P = 0.002). Abortion, mirror syndrome, foetal hydrops, foetal heart failure, foetal anaemia, intrauterine foetal death, and neonatal death mainly occurred with a PCA diameter > 9 cm. This study identifies a PCA diameter cutoff of 4.7 cm as a useful clinical tool for risk stratification. Pregnant women with a PCA diameter > 4.7 cm face higher risks of adverse outcomes, prompting recommendations for ultrasound evaluations every 1–2 weeks. These assessments should include tumour dimensions, amniotic fluid index, umbilical artery, foetal middle cerebral artery, foetal ductus venosus, and foetal echocardiography to detect complications early. A PCA diameter exceeding 9 cm significantly increases the risk of serious complications, necessitating close monitoring or taking treatment measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-08418-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The predictive potential of the placental chorioangioma diameter for adverse pregnancy outcomes: a single-centre retrospective study

Wensheng Hu, Xin Wu, Xiaofeng Weng, Wenle Huang et al.
1 citations
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies
1.88
article

The predictive potential of the placental chorioangioma diameter for adverse pregnancy outcomes: a single-centre retrospective study

Wensheng Hu, Xin Wu, Xiaofeng Weng, Wenle Huang, Xiaomin Wang, Xingzhong Hu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Placental chorioangioma (PCA) is a rare placental tumour that may significantly compromise pregnancy outcomes. However, the optimal diameter cutoff value for predicting adverse outcomes remains controversial, warranting further investigation. This retrospective study enrolled 94 pregnant women diagnosed with PCA at Wenzhou Central Hospital between January 2013 and July 2025. Additionally, stratified random sampling was used to select 159 pregnant women without a placental tumour during the same period as the non-PCA group. The basic information and pregnancy outcomes of the two groups were compared. Groups with adverse pregnancy outcomes (n = 57) and those without adverse pregnancy outcomes (n = 37) were further defined. The risk variables for adverse pregnancy outcomes in PCA patients were investigated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The therapeutic utility of the PCA diameter in evaluating adverse pregnancy outcomes in PCA patients was examined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. After stratifying the diameter, the incidence rates of adverse outcomes in different diameter intervals were statistically analysed. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the PCA diameter was a significant, though modest, independent risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes (OR = 1.026, 95% CI: 1.003–1.051, P = 0.027), implying a 2.6% increase in risk per 1-mm increase in diameter. ROC analysis demonstrated that a PCA diameter cutoff of 4.7 cm predicted adverse outcomes (82.1% sensitivity, 50.0% specificity), with an AUC of 0.705 (95% CI: 0.600-0.811, P = 0.002). Abortion, mirror syndrome, foetal hydrops, foetal heart failure, foetal anaemia, intrauterine foetal death, and neonatal death mainly occurred with a PCA diameter > 9 cm. This study identifies a PCA diameter cutoff of 4.7 cm as a useful clinical tool for risk stratification. Pregnant women with a PCA diameter > 4.7 cm face higher risks of adverse outcomes, prompting recommendations for ultrasound evaluations every 1–2 weeks. These assessments should include tumour dimensions, amniotic fluid index, umbilical artery, foetal middle cerebral artery, foetal ductus venosus, and foetal echocardiography to detect complications early. A PCA diameter exceeding 9 cm significantly increases the risk of serious complications, necessitating close monitoring or taking treatment measures.

BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthVol. 25(1)
Wenzhou Central Hospital (CN), Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.