Prognosis of Immunocompromised Patients With Respiratory Failure Managed With Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Despite the increasing number of critically ill immunocompromised patients in intensive care unit, the outcome of different types of immunocompromised patients with respiratory failure managed with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) remains unclear. What is the overall mortality of immunocompromised patients with respiratory failure managed on VV ECMO compared to immunocompetent patients? Are there differences between different types of immunocompromised states? This is a systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies of any design that reported outcomes of immunocompromised adult patients managed on VV ECMO for respiratory failure. A total of 13 studies were included. The pooled mortality among immunocompromised patients undergoing VV ECMO was 63% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49-76%, I2 : 94.23%), which was significantly higher than immunocompetent patients (odds ratio [OR]: 2.57, 95% CI: 1.22-5.41, p = 0.03, I2 : 48.18%). Among immunocompromised subgroups, only patients with hematologic malignancy exhibited significantly higher mortality (OR: 5.78, 95% CI: 1.07-31.29, p = 0.05, I2 : 0.00%). Immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure treated with VV ECMO were associated with higher mortality compared to immunocompetent patients. Mortality varied by underlying cause of immunosuppression, emphasizing the need for careful, individualized patient selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASAIO Journal
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mat.0000000000002615
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognosis of Immunocompromised Patients With Respiratory Failure Managed With Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Joseph Paladino, Ryota Sato, Natsumi Hamahata, Shunsuke Kondo et al.
ASAIO Journal
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Prognosis of Immunocompromised Patients With Respiratory Failure Managed With Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Joseph Paladino, Ryota Sato, Natsumi Hamahata, Shunsuke Kondo, Makoto Uchiyama, Y. Hirao
article en

Abstract

Despite the increasing number of critically ill immunocompromised patients in intensive care unit, the outcome of different types of immunocompromised patients with respiratory failure managed with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) remains unclear. What is the overall mortality of immunocompromised patients with respiratory failure managed on VV ECMO compared to immunocompetent patients? Are there differences between different types of immunocompromised states? This is a systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies of any design that reported outcomes of immunocompromised adult patients managed on VV ECMO for respiratory failure. A total of 13 studies were included. The pooled mortality among immunocompromised patients undergoing VV ECMO was 63% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49-76%, I2 : 94.23%), which was significantly higher than immunocompetent patients (odds ratio [OR]: 2.57, 95% CI: 1.22-5.41, p = 0.03, I2 : 48.18%). Among immunocompromised subgroups, only patients with hematologic malignancy exhibited significantly higher mortality (OR: 5.78, 95% CI: 1.07-31.29, p = 0.05, I2 : 0.00%). Immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure treated with VV ECMO were associated with higher mortality compared to immunocompetent patients. Mortality varied by underlying cause of immunosuppression, emphasizing the need for careful, individualized patient selection.

ASAIO Journal
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), Queen's Medical Center (US), Eye Care Associates (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.